Diagnosis of immunologic injury (acute and chronic) is much more difficult in
pancreas transplants when compared with transplants of other organs. Currently,
the immunosuppressive regimen for induction involves calcineurin
inhibitors (CNI), antimetabolites and corticosteroids (Cs). This strong and
nonspecific regimen does not take into consideration pancreas specificities (i.e.
the need to avoid diabetogenic compounds). For obvious reasons, CNI might
be calling for review, if permanently indicated in recipients of solitary pancreas
with mild renal dysfunction. CNI as well as corticosteroids may induce hyperglycemia
and contribute to differential diagnosis of a rejection process. However,
in spite of the benefits accruing from withdrawal of above
immunosuppressive agents, minimization or avoidance of these drugs could be
dangerous and may end up with graft loss (i.e. antibody-mediated process).
Long-term results of pancreas transplantation are now achieving comparable
survival rates similar to the transplant of traditional organs such as kidney and
liver. As a consequence, the physicians’ objectives are to prolong the patient’s
quality of life and organ function as long as possible. Weaning strategies in
regard to CNI and steroids are tested. Sirolimus, everolimus, CTLA-4 Ig, etc,
are agents known to be either both nonnephrotoxic and nondiabetogenic or
less so when compared with CNI. Their impact on pancreas transplantation is
beginning to be evaluated. Large randomized trials in all pancreas categories,
with long-term clinical and histologic results, are mandatory to establish new
guidelines for immunosuppressive regimens for pancreas transplantation