2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot study of cooperative programming learning behavior and its relationship with students' learning performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Hwang et al [18], Hwang et al [19], and Shadiev et al [20], programming language learning in cooperation offers many potential benefits. Cooperation motivates students' learning and triggers active participation.…”
Section: Cooperative Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Hwang et al [18], Hwang et al [19], and Shadiev et al [20], programming language learning in cooperation offers many potential benefits. Cooperation motivates students' learning and triggers active participation.…”
Section: Cooperative Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to McDowell et al [22], cooperative programming learning can improve learning performance. Goldman [21], McDowell et al [22], and Hwang et al [23] suggested that students who study computer programming in cooperation have better learning performance in terms of program readability and correctness compared to students who study individually. Williams et al [16] and McDowell et al [22] found that students working in cooperation spent less time solving a programming problem, and they solved it better than those who worked solely.…”
Section: Cooperative Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been a trend related to the discovery of the predictors of programming skills and the cause of the failure in programming courses (Ferrer-Mico, Fernandez & Sanchez, 2012;Hwang et al, 2012;Shaw, 2012;Lau & Yuen, 2011;Lau & Yuen, 2009;Sivasakthi & Rajendran, 2011;Hawi, 2010;Jegede, 2009). Studies on this issue show that programming success is affected by factors such as gender (Yurdugül & Aşkar, 2013;Sullivan & Bers, 2012;Lau & Yuen, 2011), programming experience (Bergersen & Gustafsson, 2011;Lau & Yuen, 2011;Jegede, 2009), academic achievement and mathematic performance (Lau & Yuen, 2009;Ambrosio et al, 2011), self-efficacy (Jegede, 2009;Altun & Mazman, 2012) and problem solving skills (Yurdugül & Aşkar, 2013;Fessakis, Gouli & Mavroudi, 2013).…”
Section: Inroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of engaging activities in programming are in-lecture live coding (Pears, 2010), collaborative learning, mainly in the form of pair programming (Hwang, Shadiev, Wang, & Huang, 2012), and use of reflective journals (Lee-Partridge, 2006).…”
Section: Strategies For Large Introductory Programming Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%