2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot randomized controlled trial of the Occupational Goal Intervention method for the improvement of executive functioning in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the high MoCA group, which is thought to have well-preserved cognitive functions, including executive function, the score improvement was greater in most of the daily activity items related to executive function. This suggests that patients with higher MoCA can expect a significant functional improvement during initial rehabilitation, which is important for executive function [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the high MoCA group, which is thought to have well-preserved cognitive functions, including executive function, the score improvement was greater in most of the daily activity items related to executive function. This suggests that patients with higher MoCA can expect a significant functional improvement during initial rehabilitation, which is important for executive function [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because many of the items in the MMSE are related to orientation, and many of the items in MoCA consist of evaluating executive function associated with functional improvement. According to a previous study, rehabilitation of executive function is related to functional improvement [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection bias is mitigated by those collecting outcome data being masked to group allocation. Six pilot RCT studies (Cook et al, 2009; Edgelow and Krupa, 2011; Gitlin et al, 2008; Novelli et al, 2018; Oliveira et al, 2018; Vizzotto et al, 2016) and eleven RCTs reported this (Callahan et al, 2017; Chen et al, 2015a; Eklund et al, 2017; Gitlin et al, 2018; Graff et al, 2006; Gunnarsson et al, 2018; Hees et al, 2013; Schene et al, 2007; Voight-Radloff et al, 2011b; Wenborn et al, 2021; Wu, 2001). We were unable to determine this in the remaining studies.…”
Section: Results/findingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These were both wait-list designs so the control group received the intervention once data collection was completed. The remaining seven studies used a different comparator, mainly an alternative activity-based or educational intervention without an occupational focus, using the same number of contacts or sessions (Chen et al, 2015a(Chen et al, , 2015bGitlin et al, 2018;Oliveira et al, 2018;Vizzotto et al, 2016); or a single advisory session (Abaoglu et al, 2020, Voight-Radloff et al, 2011b (see Table 1).…”
Section: Comparatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 22 45 49 In studies with both the control and intervention groups we found interventions such as an instrumental enrichment programme versus standard OT, 21 a programme focused on the management of the disease versus traditional OT, 25 a physical exercise programme versus traditional OT, 29 a metacognitive programme versus traditional OT, 31 a home-visit OT programme versus a management tool for daily life performance programme, 34 a recovery education programme versus traditional mental health treatment, 36 an aerobic dance programme versus a manual activities programme, 38 a balancing everyday life programme versus traditional OT, 41 a motivational intervention versus traditional OT 46 and a programme focused on executive functions versus a programme based on handmade activities. 54 In the included studies with a unique study group in which all participants were treated, we found interventions such as indoor and outdoor exercise programme, 37 a ‘therapeutic package’, 39 care as usual and cognitive–behavioural therapy 40 and a psychoeducation for schizophrenia programme. 43 Finally, three studies included three study groups to compare two different interventions with a control group: cognitive remediation therapy versus intensive OT versus healthy patients, 22 project activity group versus discussion group versus no treatment, 45 and OT at the community mental health centre (CMHC) versus OT at CMHC+psychosocial skill training versus outpatient follow-up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%