2020
DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing online versus face‐to‐face delivery of an aphasia communication partner training program for student healthcare professionals

Abstract: Background Training conversation partners of people with aphasia who use facilitative communication strategies is one method that can improve access to healthcare for people with aphasia. However, the efficacy of communication partner training (CPT) has been investigated almost exclusively in the context of face‐to‐face (F2F) delivery. Online training may offer more cost‐effective and accessible options to a wider range of conversation partners, including student healthcare professionals. Aims To conduct a pil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(51 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study included a basic science knowledge component, and 3D anatomy software was used for the anatomy course [25]. Studies that included procedural knowledge components addressed theories, frames of reference [26,27], adaptive equipment [28], psychosocial dysfunction [29], communication partner training for adult aphasia [30], and interprofessional team skills [31]. Studies involving both procedural knowledge and professional reasoning addressed ergonomics, autonomy, activity analysis, and other OT subjects [32], adult practice [33], mental health [34], fieldwork training [35], interprofessional team skills in childhood, school practice [36], dolive-well framework [37], and problem-based learning (OTA:) scenarios [38].…”
Section: Key Clinical Skills Subjects and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study included a basic science knowledge component, and 3D anatomy software was used for the anatomy course [25]. Studies that included procedural knowledge components addressed theories, frames of reference [26,27], adaptive equipment [28], psychosocial dysfunction [29], communication partner training for adult aphasia [30], and interprofessional team skills [31]. Studies involving both procedural knowledge and professional reasoning addressed ergonomics, autonomy, activity analysis, and other OT subjects [32], adult practice [33], mental health [34], fieldwork training [35], interprofessional team skills in childhood, school practice [36], dolive-well framework [37], and problem-based learning (OTA:) scenarios [38].…”
Section: Key Clinical Skills Subjects and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study included a basic science knowledge component, and 3D anatomy software was used for the anatomy course [24]. Studies that included procedural knowledge components addressed theories, frames of reference (FOR) [25,26], adaptive equipment [27], psychosocial dysfunction [28], communication partner training for adult aphasia [29], and interprofessional team skills [30]. Studies involving both procedural knowledge and clinical reasoning addressed ergonomics, autonomy, activity analysis, and other OT subjects [31], adult practice [32], mental health [33], eldwork training [34], interprofessional team skills in childhood, school practice [35], do-live-well (DLW) framework [36], and problem-based learning (PBL) scenarios [37].…”
Section: Key Clinical Skill Subjects and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three studies with a F2F comparison group, there were no signi cant differences between the e-learning and F2F groups in course satisfaction or academic performance. The course subjects of these studies were psychosocial dysfunction [28], the communication partner training (CPT) program for adults with aphasia [29], and the DLW framework [36], which were delivered by e-learning and F2F. Six studies included course subjects without the F2F comparison group.…”
Section: Digital Learning Design and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is emerging evidence that teleCPT can be effective. Power et al (2020) concluded that online delivery of a 45-minute introductory CPT course based on Supported Conversations for Adults with Aphasia (SCA) TM (Kagan et al, 2001) for student healthcare professionals was equally effective as face-to-face delivery, as measured using participant self-report. Rietdijk et al (2020a) found ASHA PERSPECTIVES SIG17 2021 -Beeke, Volkmer & Farrington-Douglas https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2021_PERSP-21-00160 negligible differences between telehealth and face-to-face delivery in a trial of TBIconneCT, a communication skills training for people with TBI and their chosen CPs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%