A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities

Abstract

Growing evidence demonstrates that people with disabilities face more challenges in accessing healthcare and wellness resources, compared to non-disabled populations. As mobile applications focused on health and wellness (mHealth apps) become prevalent, it is important that people with disabilities can access and use mHealth apps. At present, there is no source of unified information about the accessibility and usability of mHealth apps for people with disabilities. We set out to create such a source, establishing a systematic approach for evaluating app accessibility. Our goal was to develop a simple, replicable app evaluation process to generate useful information for people with disabilities (to aid suitable app selection) and app developers (to improve app accessibility and usability). We collected data using two existing assessment instruments to test three top-rated weight management apps with nine users representing three disability groups: vision, dexterity, and cognitive impairment. Participants with visual impairments reported the lowest accessibility ratings, most challenges, and least tolerance for issues. Participants with dexterity impairments experienced significant accessibility-related difficulties. Participants with cognitive impairments experienced mild difficulties and higher tolerances for issues. Our pilot protocol will be applied to test mHealth apps and populate a “curation” website to assist consumers in selecting mHealth apps.

Addressing and evaluating health literacy in mHealth: a scoping review

“…While the original intent of this recommendation was no doubt to address those with physical disabilities, those with poor literacy skills would also benefit from being able to listen to rather than having to read the content of an app. Incorporating accessibility features with attention to inclusive design considerations can promote usability of mHealth to for consumers with and without noted disabilities expanding reach to a much larger audience (71).…”

Perspective on mHealth Concepts to Ensure Users’ Empowerment–From Adverse Event Tracking for COVID-19 Vaccinations to Oncological Treatment

“…In this case, a game is presented to motivate exercising without the drawback of inter-user competition. To prevent inaccessible healthcare, people with disabilities should not be excluded from using mHealth applications [59,60]. Furthermore, mHealth applications cannot replace all tasks of general practitioners [61] and these should still be involved in the diagnosis and treatment, especially in case of emergencies.…”

The role of digital health in the cardiovascular learning healthcare system

“…We need to be cognizant of potential barriers to adoption of these systems, including perceived usefulness and ease of use from both the physician and patient’s perspectives, design and technical concerns, data privacy concerns, familiarity with the technology, risk-benefit assessment, and communication between health workers and patients ( 47 ). Additionally, some patients or patient populations cannot afford costs related to digital health which may not yet be covered by their insurance or may have limited use for certain technologies due to disability ( 55 ). While some patients easily accept and appreciate digital health in their standard healthcare, others may be unable to understand and quickly adapt to new technologies.…”