2001
DOI: 10.1002/asi.1145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A picture is worth a thousand words: Art indexing in electronic databases

Abstract: The enormous number of images of works of art available on the Internet promises great potential for research in art history and related image-using disciplines. Yet without adequate indexing, this resource is very difficult to explore. It is certainly necessary to identify each image with the basic unique information relating to it, but more is needed. Since it is largely the concepts related to works of art that interest art historians, it is these concepts that need to be reflected in indexing terminology. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual content and meaning extracted from images are rarely considered in traditional indexing systems (Jörgensen, 1998(Jörgensen, , 1999(Jörgensen, , 2003. Traditional indexing systems follow the top down approach and were designed neither with the users'language in mind nor to cover the full range of image attributes (Jörgensen, 1998;Roberts, 2001). According to Jörgensen (1998, p. 161), "the vast majority of image indexing systems are text-based systems that have been crafted from a number of pragmatic or theoretical considerations and assumptions about user needs and search strategies."…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual content and meaning extracted from images are rarely considered in traditional indexing systems (Jörgensen, 1998(Jörgensen, , 1999(Jörgensen, , 2003. Traditional indexing systems follow the top down approach and were designed neither with the users'language in mind nor to cover the full range of image attributes (Jörgensen, 1998;Roberts, 2001). According to Jörgensen (1998, p. 161), "the vast majority of image indexing systems are text-based systems that have been crafted from a number of pragmatic or theoretical considerations and assumptions about user needs and search strategies."…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from previous research shows that, though images are visual information sources with little or no associated text, image users mainly use text to formulate their queries (O'Connor, O'Connor, & Abbas, 1999;Roberts, 2001;Tjondronegoro, Spink, & Jansen, 2009), which is a result of the lack of systems that offer other options. The vast majority of Web search engines that allow image searches provide search interfaces that accept only text queries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While images are now more readily available in digital format, it is not necessarily easier to find images. Despite the priority given to images, the challenges in image retrieval are largely due to the fact that images are inherently wordless, while access to images is still predominantly reliant on text (Roberts, 2001). As a result, there is a need to gain a greater understanding of how images are used so that more effective ways of accessing images can be developed (Enser, 2008;Fidel, 1997;Hung, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Establishing and defining the subject and meaning of an image may be problematic and identifying the objects is often difficult. Furthermore, the indexing of multifaceted, often allegoric or symbolic images, which are interpreted on many different levels, presumes a certain degree of knowledge of iconography.…”
Section: What Level Of Description Should Be Adapted? What Is Our Intmentioning
confidence: 99%