2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlap.2006.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pi-calculus based semantics for WS-BPEL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most work has either focused on models for isolated transactions [4,17], including software transactional memory [18,1], or compensation-based transactions [5,9,8,20,11] where error recovery must be programmed explicitly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most work has either focused on models for isolated transactions [4,17], including software transactional memory [18,1], or compensation-based transactions [5,9,8,20,11] where error recovery must be programmed explicitly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approaches can also be combined on the use of different user level expressiveness, existence of reasoning tools, user expertise both for verification and for the hierarchical refinement design method. Lucchi et al [15] formalized a novel orchestration language that improve the quality of BPEL specification and implementation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another drawback is the strong limitation to only 8 very simple interaction patterns which are prescribed by the WSDL 2.0 [6]. To overcome this limit, BPEL can be equipped with an formal semantics as well as it is done for example in [22,23,21,33]. Secondly, it enables to avoid one-shot transformations.…”
Section: R3) Hierarchabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%