2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physiologically based clinical measure for spastic reflexes in spinal cord injury

Abstract: The SCATS produced a valid measure of 3 distinct types of spastic motor behaviors in SCI and may provide a complementary tool for measuring spastic hypertonia. Such a measure is valuable because current assessment tools do not differentiate between the different types of spastic motor behaviors that manifest after SCI. Distinguishing the 3 spastic reactions using an efficient and valid clinical tool may help guide management of spastic hypertonia in SCI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
76
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(10 reference statements)
4
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since spasticity includes both exaggerated reflexes and increased muscle tone, the H-reflex is not considered a selective measure of spasticity, which requires more specific assessment for its quantification. 14,43,45 In addition, the rat model is not a good one for spasticity, since rats show variable (to no) levels of spasticity, so that our results cannot address the level of spasticity induced by Tx. Interestingly, the anti-spastic effects of L-dopa were proposed to be mediated by group II, but not group I, afferents, 44 suggesting that spasticity involves additional mechanisms to those tested by the H-reflex, which is thought to be mediated mainly by group I afferents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since spasticity includes both exaggerated reflexes and increased muscle tone, the H-reflex is not considered a selective measure of spasticity, which requires more specific assessment for its quantification. 14,43,45 In addition, the rat model is not a good one for spasticity, since rats show variable (to no) levels of spasticity, so that our results cannot address the level of spasticity induced by Tx. Interestingly, the anti-spastic effects of L-dopa were proposed to be mediated by group II, but not group I, afferents, 44 suggesting that spasticity involves additional mechanisms to those tested by the H-reflex, which is thought to be mediated mainly by group I afferents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…25 We recommended that the rehabilitation science community abandon the MAS. Several authors have purported the merit of a test battery approach, similar to that of the Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic Reflexes, 26 for the refinement of current measures or development of new spasticity measures. 3,4,9,10 These new or refined measures will also need to undergo formal assessment of their reliability and validity before broad dissemination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,31 Adoption of clinically relevant outcome measures, such as the Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic reflexes (SCATS), which provides a better evaluation of evoked flexor reflex activity, should also be evaluated. 16,36,67 Several experimental aspects of the reflex testing technique remain to be addressed, such as identifying correctly CR thresholds and normalising EMG data across experimental groups. We defined TA CR reflex threshold in part on the subjective assessment of the stimulus being innocuous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%