SUMMARYA comparative study under uniform laboratory conditions has been made of the relative susceptibility to lime-chlorosis of 135 British species. These species were chosen as being either (a) largely confined to calcareous soils or (b) largely confined to non-calcareous, especially acidic, soils. A number of species of wider soil tolerance were also grown. It was found that the species of groups (a) and (b) differed markedly from each other in chlorosis susceptibility. More than 90° 0 of the species of calcareous soils were either resistant to lime-chlorosis or were only mildly affected, whilst more than 60",, of the species of acidic soils were susceptible to the condition. Evidence is presented that divergence in chlorosis susceptibility has occurred both within genera and within species. Family differences would also seem to occur. A possible mechanism for the origin of these differences and their ecological significance is discussed.There have been few records of the occurrence of lime-chlorosis in the natural vegetation of Britain, although it is a well-known nutritional disorder on calcareous soils in other parts of the world. During a survey of calcareous areas in England over the period 1958-65 (Grime andHutchinson, 1967), lime-chlorosis was observed in 144 species. Species differed markedly in the extent to wbich they showed chlorosis. Species such as Festuca ovina, Briza media and Thymus drucei, which are very widely distributed on calcareous soils, were never found to be chlorotic. Others, such as Fraxinus excelsior and Hieracium pilosella, were very often found to be chlorotic. Just as species differed in their susceptibility to chlorosis, so too did the soils differ in the amount of chlorotic vegetation which they supported. There was a great deal of chlorosis on the chalk areas of the North and South Downs and on the Carboniferous limestone, whilst on Oolitic and Magnesian limestone areas there was very much less.By definition, calcifuge species are not normally found on calcareous soils. Any survey of the incidence of lime-chlorosis in the field, therefore, will not reveal whether calcifuge species are particularly susceptible to lime-cblorosis. In Upper Teesdale, however, a number of species (six to eight) normally confined to acidic soils and, therefore, regarded as calcifuges, occur on the sugar limestone areas, e.g. Empetrum nigrmn, Callunavulgaris and Hypericum pulchrim. These species are severely chlorotic at these sites. There are also a number of reports from the literature of certain calcifugous species developing chlorosis when grown on a calcareous soil (Tansley, 1917;Mevius, 1927;Olsen, 1935;Grime, 1959; Rorison, 19600;Hutchinson, 19670). In each case, however, relatively few species were grown and not only did the experimental conditions vary greatly from experiment to experiment, but also the soils and the species used. It is thus impossible from the