2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physics-informed machine learning approach for solving heat transfer equation in advanced manufacturing and engineering applications

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crucially, this will ensure that forecasting remains significantly computationally cheaper than the usage of wave models. These methods have been successfully applied to the solving of differential equations in engineering (Niaki et al, 2021;Zobeiry, and Humfeld, 2021), analyzing blood flow (Arzani et al, 2021), and chaotic systems (Khodkar and Hassanzadeh, 2021). Relevant for the current discussion, these methods are also finding use in weather and climate modelling (Kashinath et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucially, this will ensure that forecasting remains significantly computationally cheaper than the usage of wave models. These methods have been successfully applied to the solving of differential equations in engineering (Niaki et al, 2021;Zobeiry, and Humfeld, 2021), analyzing blood flow (Arzani et al, 2021), and chaotic systems (Khodkar and Hassanzadeh, 2021). Relevant for the current discussion, these methods are also finding use in weather and climate modelling (Kashinath et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, many gaps and opportunities remain for further research in building ML-based models for use in composite manufacturing environments, which meet the human-interpretable needs for tractable risk reduction. Recent advances in pre-processing datasets, such as physics-informed ML [40], has provided increased interpretability for model designers by directly influencing the learning process in a common physics-based framework, towards using models for interpolation-based predictions. Further, with the recent emergence of AI explainability tools such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME)-based toolboxes, or the Shapley val-Open Journal of Composite Materials ue-based approach used by Fiddler Labs [43], there is an opportunity for further research in this field to address the above concerns, in both the construction and evaluation of models, and associated datasets for advanced manufacturing.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PINN has resulted in excitement on the use of machine learning algorithms for solving physical systems and optimizing their characteristic parameters given data. PINNs have now been applied to solve a variety of problems including fluid mechanics [54,33,20,72,10,55,46,57], solid mechanics [24,56,23,21], heat transfer [11,48,76], electro-chemistry [53,43,32], electro-magnetics [16,13,49], geophysics [7,63,62,66], and flow in porous media [19,1,6,60,34,5,64] (for a detailed review, see [35]). A few libraries have also been developed for solving PDEs using PINNs, including SciANN [22], DeepXDE [44], SimNet [25], and NeuralPDE [77].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%