2015
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/2/2/025006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physics-based model of gate-tunable metal–graphene contact resistance benchmarked against experimental data

Abstract: The metal-graphene contact resistance is a technological bottleneck for the realization of viable graphene based electronics. We report a useful model to find the gate tunable components of this resistance determined by the sequential tunneling of carriers between the 3Dmetal and 2D-graphene underneath followed by Klein tunneling to the graphene in the channel.This model quantifies the intrinsic factors that control that resistance, including the effect of unintended chemical doping. Our results agree with exp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For different metals, we compare results of our simulations for the medium (point A) and short (point B) structures, with experimental and theoretical results from the literature. Material Medium structure Short structure Experimental Results Theoretical results (Ω · μ m) (Ω · μ m) reported (Ω · μ m) reported (Ω · μ m) Cu 1153 374 184–263 43 627 18 92–254 46 44 19 Ni 360 120 294 12 , 300 37 600 23 800 38 150–350 40 Pd 2899 2076 320–715 9 403 18 600 37 185–230 17 584 43 , 122–484 46 Pt 209 123 764 18 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different metals, we compare results of our simulations for the medium (point A) and short (point B) structures, with experimental and theoretical results from the literature. Material Medium structure Short structure Experimental Results Theoretical results (Ω · μ m) (Ω · μ m) reported (Ω · μ m) reported (Ω · μ m) Cu 1153 374 184–263 43 627 18 92–254 46 44 19 Ni 360 120 294 12 , 300 37 600 23 800 38 150–350 40 Pd 2899 2076 320–715 9 403 18 600 37 185–230 17 584 43 , 122–484 46 Pt 209 123 764 18 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a metal is brought into contact with graphene, a junction with high contact resistivity is created, typically attributed to the low density of states (DOS) in graphene in particular when the Fermi level is near the Dirac point . Although ab initio calculations provide deeper insights into the contact problem, they also highlight the importance of the metal . Experimentally, various methods have been reported to reduce R C : one of the most common approaches is postmetallization annealing .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…several questions remain open in this field including the fine control of the separation distance metal-graphene; the perturbation of graphene's bandstructure due to the presence of metals [32,45] (see Supporting Information Note 5) including the possible creation of defects due to the metal deposition; the effect of metal granularity [54] in the dipole created at metal-graphene interfaces or undesired residual current being injected from the graphene to the metal in some cases (see Supporting Information Note 7). Finally, our results can be extended to other 2D materials [41,42] and are relevant to other applications where the spatial extent of lateral p-n junctions at metalgraphene interfaces is important, including contacts [36][37][38][39] and photodetectors [43,44]. We solve the non-linear Poisson's equation, described by Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…resulting from the charge redistribution at these one-dimensional interfaces [33,37,45], where ( ) is a consequence of both, the electrostatic gating due to the back gate potential g V tuning the overall Fermi level F E within the entire graphene device and the asymmetry of the chemical potential along the graphene sheet due to the presence of the metal island ( Fig. 2b).…”
Section: Electrostatic Model Of P-n Junctions At Metal-graphene Intermentioning
confidence: 99%