2020
DOI: 10.3390/met10050622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Physics-Based Mean-Field Model for Ferrite Recovery and Recrystallization

Abstract: An original mean field model for the nucleation and the growth of new recrystallized grains during annealing treatments of deformed, low-carbon ferritic steels is proposed in this paper. The model was calibrated on two steels extensively studied in the literature under both isothermal annealing and continuous heating schedules. It permits one to predict not only recrystallization kinetics but also advanced microstructural features (such as dislocation density, dislocation cell size and grain size) during compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of magnitude of the critical heating rate for this transition between two modes of interaction (the so-called "weak" and "strong" interactions) is in accordance with previous studies on similar systems [2,28,73]. Detailed experimental and modelling study of recrystallization is presented in [55,74]. Regarding the pearlitic ferrite, no significant recrystallization occurs during both slow and fast heating, as confirmed by EBSD analyses.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutions During Heating To Ac1supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The order of magnitude of the critical heating rate for this transition between two modes of interaction (the so-called "weak" and "strong" interactions) is in accordance with previous studies on similar systems [2,28,73]. Detailed experimental and modelling study of recrystallization is presented in [55,74]. Regarding the pearlitic ferrite, no significant recrystallization occurs during both slow and fast heating, as confirmed by EBSD analyses.…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutions During Heating To Ac1supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The isolated carbides are larger in average after slow heating than after fast heating (Table 2), because of the larger size of the carbides located at the boundaries of the recrystallized ferrite grains. More measurements can also be found in reference [74].…”
Section: Microstructure Evolutions During Heating To Ac1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the average subgrain size can be calculated from the capillary coarsening effect and the stress-dependent refining effect of subgrain. Zurob et al Described the detailed calculation of average subgrain size [11,12]. In this case, the discontinuous DRX behaviors of AISI 304L austenitic stainless steel with fcc structure were performed by the phase-field model over a range of hot working parameters (temperature: 973 K to 1373 K, strain rate: 0.001/s to 3/s) and initial grain sizes (8 μm to 120 μm).…”
Section: Modelling Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the scope of the numerical transition of industry, steelmakers develop new modeling tools to drive their product lines [1][2][3]. Contrary to purely statistical approaches (including new machine learning capabilities), physic-based models offer additional advantages in terms of predicting ability even outside their calibration range, modularity, or possible extensions to other production steps or sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%