2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A physics-based atmospheric and BRDF correction for Landsat data over mountainous terrain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show slight improvement in the AGB model goodness of fit and RMSE when the topographic correction is applied to the images. Although spectrally normalized vegetation indices such as the NDVI are less affected by the topographic-induced illumination variations [78,79], we believe that robust modeling of bidirectional distribution reflection function (BDRF) should provide for a more robust approach to handle the sun-object-sensor geometry variations common in forested land covers [80,81]. However, modeling the BDRF requires multi-view and multi-date images, which can be hard to achieve in our study area due to the persistent cloud cover found throughout the year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show slight improvement in the AGB model goodness of fit and RMSE when the topographic correction is applied to the images. Although spectrally normalized vegetation indices such as the NDVI are less affected by the topographic-induced illumination variations [78,79], we believe that robust modeling of bidirectional distribution reflection function (BDRF) should provide for a more robust approach to handle the sun-object-sensor geometry variations common in forested land covers [80,81]. However, modeling the BDRF requires multi-view and multi-date images, which can be hard to achieve in our study area due to the persistent cloud cover found throughout the year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various algorithms have been developed to correct such effects in the image. These include calibrations based on sensor parameters, solar-Earth geometry, dark object subtraction and radiative transfer [5][6][7][8]. Correction of atmospheric effects is important in relation to improving data quality [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note, however, that surface BRDF and atmospheric corrections can be coupled but that this requires knowledge of the atmospheric constituents and/or sufficient multi-angular observations for model inversion [37,[48][49][50], which are not available from Sentinel-2 data. Despite this, research on the use of more physically-based correction approaches, and ones that include corrections for topographic and adjacency effects, that are particularly evident in medium spatial resolution data [51,52], is recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%