2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/805/2/181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PHYSICAL APPROACH TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-ZMERGERS: MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION IN THE STELLAR MASS DOMAIN

Abstract: At z 1, the distinction between merging and "normal" star-forming galaxies based on single band morphology is often hampered by the presence of large clumps which result in a disturbed, merger-like appearance even in rotationally supported disks. In this paper we discuss how a classification based on canonical, non-parametric structural indices measured on resolved stellar mass maps, rather than on single-band images, reduces the misclassification of clumpy but not merging galaxies. We calibrate the mass-based… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
(187 reference statements)
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sums of the stellar mass in these maps agree within 0.1 dex with the integrated stellar-mass estimates that use longer wavelength photometry (e.g., Spitzer/IRAC 3.6-8.0 μm; Cibinel et al 2015), suggesting that the maps provide a good description of stellar-mass distribution in obscured SFGs. These stellar-mass maps serve as a reference frame to map where star formation is occurring in relation to stellar-mass buildup within each galaxy.…”
Section: Observations and Ancillary Datasupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The sums of the stellar mass in these maps agree within 0.1 dex with the integrated stellar-mass estimates that use longer wavelength photometry (e.g., Spitzer/IRAC 3.6-8.0 μm; Cibinel et al 2015), suggesting that the maps provide a good description of stellar-mass distribution in obscured SFGs. These stellar-mass maps serve as a reference frame to map where star formation is occurring in relation to stellar-mass buildup within each galaxy.…”
Section: Observations and Ancillary Datasupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This number needs to be adjusted for the completeness of the visual classification. We do not have exact numbers for these completenesses, however, given previous work on quantitative morphology measures (Pawlik et al 2016), it was shown that morphology measures can miss mergers identified by eye, we therefore expect the completeness to be higher than that derived by Cibinel et al (2015) (¿50-70%), leading to a correction of the upper limits by < 1.4. From the visual classification, this leads to a very conservative upper limit of 15% for clear mergers.…”
Section: Constraints On Major Merger Ratesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In that respect, it is important to calibrate with simulations that closely match the properties of the observed samples. For example, as shown in Cibinel et al (2015), the morphological signatures of mergers at z > 1 differ from those of mergers at z ∼ 0, and parametric classifications that robustly identify low-z mergers fail at z > 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%