2001
DOI: 10.1080/00275514.2001.12063243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phylogenetic redefinition of anamorph genera inMycosphaerellabased on ITS rDNA sequence and morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
75
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an example that even in genera known for more than a hundred years new morphological characteristics can be discovered with ''simple'' light microscopy! The discovery of the new kind of parasite-host interaction in cercosporoid fungi might provide some clues in the interpretation of molecular-based phylogenetic hypotheses in Mycosphaerella and related genera, which hitherto did not include species of Cercosporella (Crous et al 2001, Braun et al 2003.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is an example that even in genera known for more than a hundred years new morphological characteristics can be discovered with ''simple'' light microscopy! The discovery of the new kind of parasite-host interaction in cercosporoid fungi might provide some clues in the interpretation of molecular-based phylogenetic hypotheses in Mycosphaerella and related genera, which hitherto did not include species of Cercosporella (Crous et al 2001, Braun et al 2003.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In DNA-based phylogenetic hypotheses, analyses of ITS DNA sequence data led to the concept of Mycosphaerella being monophyletic (Crous et al 2001), which was changed to a concept of polyphyly when applying LSU rDNA sequences (Crous et al 2007a). Genus Davidiella for species with Cladosporium anamorphs was separated from Mycosphaerella with other anamorphs (Braun et al 2003) and genus Teratosphaeria re-established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species of Mycosphaerella inhabit different ecological niches as saprobes, plant pathogens or endophytes (Farr et al 1995, Verkley & Starink-Willemse 2004, Crous et al 2004b, 2006a, 2007a, b), and have a worldwide distribution from tropical and subtropical to warm and cool regions (Crous 1998, Crous et al 2000, 2001). Plant-pathogenic species of Mycosphaerella are among the most common and destructive plant pathogens occurring on a wide range of hosts including trees, herbaceous plants, and plantation crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deighton (1979) placed both varieties in the genus Paracercospora , based on the slight thickening observed on the rims of scars and conidial hila. However, this feature was not supported by DNA phylogeny, and as there were many intermediate morphological forms, the genus Paracercospora was again reduced to synonymy under Pseudocercospora by Crous et al (2001). Mycosphaerella eumusae ( Pseudocercospora eumusae ), was recognised as a new constituent of the Sigatoka complex of banana in the mid-1990s (Carlier et al 2000, Crous & Mourichon 2002, Jones 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the observed shapes of the conidiophores and conidia were also observed in pycnidia of species belonging to other genera. DNA sequencing facilitated numerous systematic revisions, and resulted in the addition of new genera to the long-standing coelomycetes such as Septoria , Mycosphaerella , Phoma , Coniothyrium and Phomopsis ( Diaporthe ) (Crous et al., 2001, de Gruyter et al., 2013, Gomes et al., 2013, Verkley et al., 2013, Verkley et al., 2014). Therefore, a comprehensive study was needed to place them with high confidence in the context of a phylogenetically-based classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%