1990
DOI: 10.2307/2419353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Coneflower Genera (Asteraceae: Heliantheae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These characters (quantitative and polymorphic) are normally excluded from phylogenetic analysis for a variety of reasons, e.g., they show intraspecific variation (Gensel, 1992), are arbitrarily defined (Cox and Urbatsch, 1990), or are highly homoplastic (Campbell and Frost, 1993;Wiens, 1995). Nevertheless, these types of characters are common and are occasionally used in studies, such as ours, that aim to examine inter-intraspecific variation (Campbell and Frost, 1993;Gutberlet, 1998;Wiens, 1999Wiens, , 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characters (quantitative and polymorphic) are normally excluded from phylogenetic analysis for a variety of reasons, e.g., they show intraspecific variation (Gensel, 1992), are arbitrarily defined (Cox and Urbatsch, 1990), or are highly homoplastic (Campbell and Frost, 1993;Wiens, 1995). Nevertheless, these types of characters are common and are occasionally used in studies, such as ours, that aim to examine inter-intraspecific variation (Campbell and Frost, 1993;Gutberlet, 1998;Wiens, 1999Wiens, , 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of continuous morphometric characters has long been criticized in the cladistic literature (Crisp and Weston ; Pimentel and Riggins ; Cranston and Humprhies ; Cox and Urbatsch ; Stevens ; Crowe ), with so‐called discrete characters (e.g. the presence and the absence of a particular structure) being considered more reliable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subtribe is phy- Robinson's (1978Robinson's ( , 1981 removal of Echinacea to the Ecliptinae and his establishment of the Rudbeckiinae, the four coneflower genera had always been associated with one another. In the phylogenetic investigation by Cox and Urbatsch (1990) Echinacea invariably was sister to Rudbeckia sect. Echinacea differs significantly from Dracopis, Ratibida, and Rudbeckia in embryological features (Battaglia 1952).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Robinson 1978(Robinson , 1981. ex Pers., Balsamorhiza, Helianthella, Verbesina L., and Wyethia composed a second clade (Cox and Urbatsch 1990). Although not specifically addressed, the phylogenetic position of Echinacea in the subtribe Ecliptinae is probably with such genera as Balsamorhiza Nutt., Helianthella Torrey & A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation