2019
DOI: 10.1109/jphot.2019.2913456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PHY/MAC Cross-Layer Analysis for IEEE 802.15.7 Uplink Visible Local Area Network

Abstract: Supported by IEEE 802.15.7 standardization activities, visible local area network (VLAN) has been gaining popularity in recent years. Specified in the standard are physical (PHY) and uplink medium access control (MAC) layers of VLAN. However, there is a lack of studies on the MAC performance analysis and improvement under the effects of PHY transmission errors in the literature. We thoroughly analyze the MAC for various performance metrics taking into account PHY transmission errors due to different VLC physic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another cogent reason for adopting this simple channel model here is that adopting other channel models can add significant randomness to the performance metrics, which can hinder understanding the intrinsic behaviour of CSMA-CA. It is also worth noting that most of the related works [16,[18][19][20][21][22] employ the same channel model justified by the results of several studies investigating the channel model of indoor VLC [28][29][30], which conclude the tiny effects of NLOS.…”
Section: Imperfect Channel Sensing (Ics)mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another cogent reason for adopting this simple channel model here is that adopting other channel models can add significant randomness to the performance metrics, which can hinder understanding the intrinsic behaviour of CSMA-CA. It is also worth noting that most of the related works [16,[18][19][20][21][22] employ the same channel model justified by the results of several studies investigating the channel model of indoor VLC [28][29][30], which conclude the tiny effects of NLOS.…”
Section: Imperfect Channel Sensing (Ics)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Evaluating the effects of the ICS on the performance of IEEE 802.15.7 CSMA-CA is a challenge as ICS results from the interaction amongst several stochastic processes; specifically, the stochastic processes that generate packets, manage durations between two consecutive CSMA-CA channel assessments and outline the directivity of light beams. Several works have been devoted to overcoming this challenge by employing one or more simplification assumptions, such as a transmitter that can see all ongoing transmissions from other nodes [18][19][20][21][22], or when the traffic generated by a node is set in accordance with the channel status, as proposed in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the previous works, Dang and Mai included some physical parameters into an extended version of Dobar’s Markov chain model, resulting in a 3D graph structure [ 11 ]. Although the authors stated that a single reflection was considered to simulate its impact on the network performance, there is a lack of results in this regard.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is straightforward to demonstrate that the conclusions extracted from these works are strongly biased and cannot be considered as accurate models of real-world deployments. Moreover, there are few contributions in the literature addressing the problem in a holistic manner [ 11 ]. Due to the relative novelty of VLC there are not many software libraries for traditional network simulation platforms (OMNET++, NS-2, OPNET, Prowler, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the identification efficiency is not optimal. In recent years, a physical layer separation technology can identify tags in collision time slots and can greatly improve the identification efficiency [4]. The technology requires the separation of collided signals before the decoding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%