2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1746-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A photon recycling approach to the denoising of ultra-low dose X-ray sequences

Abstract: The results are consistent with the number of patches used, and they demonstrate that it is possible to use motion estimation techniques and "recycle" photons from previous frames to improve the image quality of the current frame. Our results are comparable in terms of CNR to Video Block Matching 3D-a state-of-the-art denoising method. But qualitative analysis by experts confirms that the denoised ultra-low dose X-ray images obtained using our method are more realistic with respect to appearance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, simple averaging compromises image sharpness, smears edges and produces motion blur. Several authors propose methods which couple filtering processes with edge detection techniques [19, 39, 40]. Although these approaches permit relative good results in terms of noise reduction and edge preservation, the implementation algorithms are still too complex and could compromise the real-time computation for on-line implementation during fluoroscopic exams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, simple averaging compromises image sharpness, smears edges and produces motion blur. Several authors propose methods which couple filtering processes with edge detection techniques [19, 39, 40]. Although these approaches permit relative good results in terms of noise reduction and edge preservation, the implementation algorithms are still too complex and could compromise the real-time computation for on-line implementation during fluoroscopic exams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm proved capable to reduce noise (CNR resulted increased) and, at the same time, not to smooth out image edges. As in recent studies on low-dose X-ray-based imaging denoising [32, 40, 41], the NVCA performances were tested against the current state-of-the-art block-matching four-dimensional VBM4D video denoising. The noise variance of the fluoroscopic sequences considered for the comparison was stabilized via the Anscombe transformation to successfully apply the VBM4D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, as suggested in [14,29]: , can be assumed to have signal-independent noise with unit variance. Figure 3 shows the power spectral densities (PSDs) and the noise power spectra (NPSs) derived in the GAT ¢ y l i 2 , respectively.…”
Section: X-ray Imaging Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent conventional denoising approaches can be broadly classified as: (i) transform-based techniques that involve sophisticated thresholding of coefficients in a transform domain [2][3][4], (ii) methods that take advantage of self-similar structures in images [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], and (iii) variational approaches that are based on partial differential equations [16,17]. For example, block matching 3D (BM3D) [7] (still considered one of the most effective methods [18][19][20]) and denoising based on a weighted nuclear norm minimization (WNNM) [8] are well-known patch-based approaches that combine non-local self similarity with transformbased processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%