2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A photometric study of the eclipsing symbiotic binary AR Pavonis

Abstract: In this study we present and re‐analyse the historical, 1889–1998, light curve (LC) of the eclipsing symbiotic binary AR Pav. For the first time, we show that the timing of mid‐points of eclipses observed during a quiescent phase obeys a quadratic ephemeris, with an initial orbital period P0=605.18 d and a rate of period change . We determined a distance to the system of 5.8±1.5 kpc, the mass ratio of the giant to the hot star, MgMh=0.4±0.1, the mass of the giant, Mg=1.8+1/−0.5 M⊙ and its radius, Rg=167±15 R⊙… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The error in the distance (Table 3) is again dominated by the uncertainty of the red giant radius R c . The above distance is in good agreement with previous estimates which range from 3.8 kpc to 5.8 kpc (Thackeray & Hutchings 1974;Kenyon & Webbink 1984;Skopal et al 2000).…”
Section: Luminosity Mass and Distancesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The error in the distance (Table 3) is again dominated by the uncertainty of the red giant radius R c . The above distance is in good agreement with previous estimates which range from 3.8 kpc to 5.8 kpc (Thackeray & Hutchings 1974;Kenyon & Webbink 1984;Skopal et al 2000).…”
Section: Luminosity Mass and Distancesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is indeed quite instructive to see that only direct observations of the stellar absorbtion features of the M star enable a proper interpretion of emission line radial velocities. An even higher mass for the hot companion was suggested by Skopal et al (2000), working with the same mass function as Thackeray & Hutchings (1974). They assumed that the system undergoes Roche lobe overflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are much lower than the radius of the eclipsed object, R h,ecl ∼ 0.1 A (46 R ), derived from optical eclipses (Skopal et al 2000a;Andrews 1974). Unfortunately, our method does not allow to measure accurately the wing positions for b < ∼ 6Å because of the presence of strong central absorption.…”
Section: The M Giant the Hot Companion And The Geometry Of Ar Pav Symentioning
confidence: 74%
“…They suggested variations in the mass transfer rate from the red giant to the hot component as the most satisfying explanation. Skopal et al (2000a) noted that the AR Pav light curve has a characteristic shape similar to those of dwarf novae in quiescent phase; whereas during the active phases the profile of the light curve changes considerably.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%