2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A photographic method to measure food item intake. Validation in geriatric institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was supported by the high agreement among the non-trained assessors using the DIMS method to estimate nutrient intake. This finding is in line with other studies reporting high inter-assessor reliability between nontrained assessors analysing food intake using photographic methods (10,15) . Surprisingly, it has also been reported that the performance of non-trained assessors was comparable to their trained counterparts (16) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This was supported by the high agreement among the non-trained assessors using the DIMS method to estimate nutrient intake. This finding is in line with other studies reporting high inter-assessor reliability between nontrained assessors analysing food intake using photographic methods (10,15) . Surprisingly, it has also been reported that the performance of non-trained assessors was comparable to their trained counterparts (16) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pouyet, Cuvelier, Benattar and Giboreau [13] addressed this issue by examining image-based dietary assessment in a geriatric setting, and Nicklas et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although computer-based portion judgments are predictive of real food intake 49,50 , it could be instructive to explore how temporal discounting moderates real food intake in at varying IMI lengths. One possible issue is that obese and overweight individuals are shown to under-report portion sizes 51,52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%