A phenomenographic study of students' conceptions of quality in learning in higher education in Rwanda

Abstract

The aim of this study is to understand the different ways that university students conceptualise quality in learning by drawing on a phenomenographic approach. A total of 20 students in higher education in Rwanda were interviewed, and analysis of the interviews generated an outcome space of conceptions of quality in learning as transformation, practice, knowledge durability, and employability. The findings illustrate the importance of the relationship between education and work as an important aspect of conceptions of quality in learning. This relationship connects to the discourse of employability in which graduates are expected to become flexible and adaptable to changes in context and over the course of time.

Exploring Finnish Guidance Counselors’ Conceptions of Career Management Skills

“…The research questions are addressed from a secondorder perspective, in which individual accounts inform the researcher's description of different conceptions of the target phenomenon (Marton, 1981(Marton, , 1994. In phenomenographic analysis, terms like conception, experience, apprehension, and way of understanding are used interchangeably (Marton & Booth, 1997), as are verbs like experience, perceive, conceive, conceptualize, and understand (Bamwesiga et al, 2013). These terms are used in an experiential rather than a psychological or cognitive sense (Marton & Booth, 1997).…”

Exploring the Challenges and Strategies for Enhancing Biotechnology Instruction in a Modularized Context at University of Rwanda-College of Science and Technology

“…With the growing necessity to raise the quality of education, Rwanda did not evade the development of education at the international level brought by the Bologna system to harmonise higher education with that of other countries. The Bologna modular system was adopted to consolidate the learner-centred pedagogy at university level to increase the students' involvement in the class (Mbabazi Bamwesiga et al, 2013). This was done to encourage teachers to engage with students and cater to their individual needs, recognising their differences (Mugisha et al, 2010).…”