2014
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2014.883090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phenology-based method to derive biomass production anomalies for food security monitoring in the Horn of Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenological variables were retrieved from the FAPAR time series using the model-fit approach described in Meroni et al [9]. Briefly, the seasonality (being uni-or bi-modal) is detected analyzing the autocorrelation of the FAPAR time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phenological variables were retrieved from the FAPAR time series using the model-fit approach described in Meroni et al [9]. Briefly, the seasonality (being uni-or bi-modal) is detected analyzing the autocorrelation of the FAPAR time series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, an earlier (or later) than usual development will in any case generate a positive (or negative) NDVI anomaly in the initial part of the season, even if the overall production is not actually affected. Approaches accounting for vegetation phenology in the analysis of overall growing season productivity have recently been proposed to overcome this possible limitation [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we chose the approach recently published by Meroni et al (2014), which is well capable of dealing with the bimodal seasonality common to East Africa. The was at least 0.10.…”
Section: Phenological Analysis From Ndvi Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean FAPAR images of every dekad (i.e., 10 days) in the year (n=36) calculated for the period 1999-2012 were used as input for the classification. All non-vegetated areas, defined as pixels with an overall variability of the entire FAPAR time series (as measured by the 95th-5th percentile difference) less than the FAPAR uncertainty (assumed to be 0.1 as in Meroni et al, 2014b), were masked out. The resulting ISODATA classification yielded eight classes from which six were covered by sample sites (class 1 to 6).…”
Section: Rs Proxy For Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time interval for integration is dynamically adjusted for every site and every year based on the start and end of the season (SOS, EOS). The required phenology parameters (SOS, EOS; maximum value of FAPAR, maxv) were calculated using the model-fit approach of Meroni et al (2014b). In general, the value of CFAPAR depends on the shape of the FAPAR seasonal trajectory, the integration limits and the baseline value.…”
Section: Rs Proxy For Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%