We read with great interest the phase 2 randomized trial FLOT4-AIO. Al-Batran et al. have published the results of the phase 2 part of this phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial (RCT). They have compared FLOT (Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, 5FU and leucovorin) regimen to the standard neoadjuvant regimen [ECX/epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-flourouracil (ECF)] (1). The primary end point for this trial was tumour regression grade (TRG1a as per Becker's criteria) of primary tumor. All age group of patients with non-metastatic gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (GaCaGEJ), > cT2 and/or N+ve, were included and patients with adjacent organ invasion were excluded. The groups compared included 137 patients in ECX/ECF vs. 128 in FLOT group in a modified intention to treat analysis. The significant findings included an improved resectability rate, favorable pT stage and R0 resection rate with the use of FLOT. FLOT also resulted in an improved overall TRG1a and TRG1a + 1b and an improved TRG1a + 1b in the intestinal histology, without any increase in perioperative outcomes and non-surgical adverse events (1).The level I evidence favoring the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for GaCaGEJ was generated following the publication of landmark MAGIC trial in 2006 (2). This landmark phase III RCT compared six cycles of ECF administered peri-operatively to surgery alone for treatment of non-metastatic ≥ stage II GaCaGEJ cancers. The salient findings in favor of NAC were a significant T and N downstaging, improvement in R0 resection, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), without any added morbidity and mortality (2). Subsequently, French FNLCC ACCORD 07 trial, which used the doublet of cisplatin and 5-flourouracil (CF) echoed the results of the MAGIC trial (3). In the real world-setting, a study has also shown that it is possible to replace cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOX) without compromising delivery of care and efficacy (4).Subsequently, EORTC 40954 was stopped due to poor accrual, but showed a significantly higher R0 resection rate with NAC without an associated improvement in survival (5). Another phase III trial, which was also closed early, compared NAC to NAC followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (6). Addition of CRT resulted in a significantly higher percentage of pathological complete response rate (pCR) and node negativity but non-significant improvement in survival (6). These two phase III trials failed to show survival advantage, but showed that neoadjuvant therapy improves R0 resection and pCR rate for GaCaGEJ (5,6). The CROSS trial, has shown that preoperative CRT is associated with significantly higher R0 resection, pCR rate and OS as compared to surgery alone (7). However, despite the use of neoadjuvant treatment options the 5-year OS as per these RCTs for GaCaGEJ has still not improved markedly. Docetaxel, platinum (cisplatin/oxaliplatin) and 5-Flourouracil (5-FU) has been used as the regimen of choice for metastatic GaCaGEJ and the use of taxanes has bee...