2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9583-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase II trial evaluating the palliative benefit of second-line oral ibandronate in breast cancer patients with either a skeletal related event (SRE) or progressive bone metastases (BM) despite standard bisphosphonate (BP) therapy

Abstract: Patients with either progressive bone metastases or SREs while on clodronate or pamidronate may experience significant pain palliation with a switch to a more potent bisphosphonate. If confirmed by randomized trials, clinicians can start moving away from the paradigm whereby patients remain on a single bisphosphonate regimen throughout the course of their disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bisphosphonates can potently reduce telopeptide levels, 32,33 which correlate well with reduced pain. 34,35 Patients in this study had already been treated with bisphosphonates for a mean duration of 15.2 months and it is possible that these patients had therefore already experienced the maximal suppression of their bone turnover. If suppression was maximal, then neither telopeptide levels nor pain scores would be expected to change as a result of a high dose of vitamin D. It should be emphasized that patients in this study were administered different bisphosphonates, and these were given both orally and intravenously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bisphosphonates can potently reduce telopeptide levels, 32,33 which correlate well with reduced pain. 34,35 Patients in this study had already been treated with bisphosphonates for a mean duration of 15.2 months and it is possible that these patients had therefore already experienced the maximal suppression of their bone turnover. If suppression was maximal, then neither telopeptide levels nor pain scores would be expected to change as a result of a high dose of vitamin D. It should be emphasized that patients in this study were administered different bisphosphonates, and these were given both orally and intravenously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer completed the study. At 12 weeks patients achieved a signifi cant improvement in pain control (OR 0.41; p = 0.028), 46% of those being a palliative response and thus clinically relevant (Clemons et al 2008). This fi nding needs further investigation in the setting of a randomized trial, however, if confi rmed, it may mean that a variety of bisphosphonates can be used through the course of a patient's disease.…”
Section: Palliation Of Symptoms With Ibandronatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another controversial issue is switching to another bisphosphonate after SRE develops. In two phase II studies, it has been shown that patients with skeletal progression or experiencing SRE while on clodranate or pamidronate, switching to more potent bisphosphonates zoledronic acid or ibandronate, may provide pain palliation and may also reduce bone turnover markers (Clemons et al, 2006, Clemons et al, 2008. In another phase II study that evaluate switching, in patients whom urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx) levels are still elevated despite zoledronic acid treatment switching to denosumab reduced uNTx levels significantly then continuing zoledronic acid and patients in switch arm also experienced less SRE (Fizazi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Clinical Use Of Bone Modifying Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%