1995
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase II study of carboplatin and vinorelbine as second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer

Abstract: Slmnerap Forty-one patients with advanced breast cancer were gven carboplatin and vinorelbine as secondline therapy. Overall objective response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval 26-56%). Myelotoxcicity was the most frequently observed toxic effect; grade III-IV leucopenia occurred in 46% of the patients. Our regimen is active as second-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer and warrants further evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vinorelbine also has demonstrated significant antitumor activity against breast carcinoma when combined with other agents such as doxorubicin, [17][18][19] epirubicin, 20,21 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), [22][23][24] mitomycin C, [25][26][27][28][29] cisplatin, 30,31 and carboplatin. 32 Paclitaxel, conversely, promotes and stabilizes polymerized tubulin into nonfunctional microtubule bundles and therefore blocks the cells in the G2/Mphase of the cell cycle. It has proven activity in various solid tumors, including breast carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vinorelbine also has demonstrated significant antitumor activity against breast carcinoma when combined with other agents such as doxorubicin, [17][18][19] epirubicin, 20,21 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), [22][23][24] mitomycin C, [25][26][27][28][29] cisplatin, 30,31 and carboplatin. 32 Paclitaxel, conversely, promotes and stabilizes polymerized tubulin into nonfunctional microtubule bundles and therefore blocks the cells in the G2/Mphase of the cell cycle. It has proven activity in various solid tumors, including breast carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been one prior published study applying the combination of carboplatin and vinorelbine [29]. However, no attempt was made to define the MTD of the combination and drug doses were selected rather arbitrarily based on reasonably tolerated doses of the drugs from other single agent or two-drug combination studies (vinorelbine 30 mg/m 2 days 1 + 8; carboplatin 250 mg/m 2 day 1) in a phase II evaluation of the regimen [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion was that this regimen is considered active as a second-line therapy in MBC [139]. In a study performed by Iaffaioli et al [140], 41 patients with MBC were given carboplatin and vinorelbine as second-line therapy. The RR was 46% (range 26–56%).…”
Section: Experience With Combination Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RR was 46% (range 26–56%). Myelotoxicity was the most frequent side effect, with grade III/IV leukopenia seen in 46% of patients [140]. In a phase I trial on patients with refractory solid tumors, 38 patients were treated with vinorelbine and oxaliplatin.…”
Section: Experience With Combination Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%