A Phase II Study of Irinotecan Alternated with a Weekly Schedule of Oxaliplatin, High-Dose Leucovorin and 48-Hour Infusion 5-Fluorouracil in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Abstract:Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) alternated with a weekly treatment for 4 weeks of oxaliplatin (L-OHP), high-dose leucovorin (LV) and a 48-hour 5-fluorouracil infusion (5-FU48h) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Patients and Methods: Previously untreated patients with ACC received chemotherapy consisting of a weekly treatment for 4 weeks of L-OHP (65 mg/m2), high-dose LV (150 mg/m2) followed by a… Show more
“…We found evidence that our regimen decreases the specific drug neurotoxicity. Possible sources of reduced neurotoxicity include the weekly schedule developed by our group and confirmed by other studies with the same reduced toxicity [16,17,18]and a lower L-OHP dosage for single administration. Only 2 patients experienced grade 3 myelotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…After taking into account its reduced neurotoxicity in the weekly schedule [16,17,18],we preferred an L-OHP subdivision dosage at 65 mg/m 2 for single administration. The secondary aims were to evaluate the treatment in terms of time to disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and QoL.…”
Objectives: Colorectal cancer is usually diagnosed in elderly patients. Since there is clear evidence that such patients are under-treated and under-represented or even excluded from clinical studies and there are no reliable and prospective data on the feasibility and efficacy of an oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based chemotherapy in this setting, we have tested the L-OHP plus oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and oral folinic acid (FA) combination as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) aged 70 or older. Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients with advanced or MCRC, aged over 70, were treated with L-OHP 65 mg/m2 as an intravenous 3-hour infusion on day 1 and 8 plus UFT 300 mg/m2 and FA 90 mg in 3 divided doses given orally on days 1–14 for each 3-week cycle. Patients were followed by a geriatric and a quality of life (QoL) assessment with specific scales and EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 45 for response to treatment. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (4%) and partial response in 22 (47%) [overall response rate, 51%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 40.7–61.2%]; 18 patients (38%) had stable disease, and 5 (11%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months (range, 3–19+ months). After a minimum follow-up of 17 months, the median time to disease progression and the median overall survival were 8.0 (95% CI: 6.7–9.3%) and 14.1 (95% CI: 11.0–17.1%) months, respectively. Regimen safety was manageable. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and this did not result in QoL impairment. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (17%), neutro- and thrombocytopenia (2%), laryngeal spasm (2%), and peripheral neuropathy (12.7%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: These results confirmed that this tested chemotherapy combination is active with acceptable tolerability and QoL maintenance in elderly patients with advanced or MCRC.
“…We found evidence that our regimen decreases the specific drug neurotoxicity. Possible sources of reduced neurotoxicity include the weekly schedule developed by our group and confirmed by other studies with the same reduced toxicity [16,17,18]and a lower L-OHP dosage for single administration. Only 2 patients experienced grade 3 myelotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…After taking into account its reduced neurotoxicity in the weekly schedule [16,17,18],we preferred an L-OHP subdivision dosage at 65 mg/m 2 for single administration. The secondary aims were to evaluate the treatment in terms of time to disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and QoL.…”
Objectives: Colorectal cancer is usually diagnosed in elderly patients. Since there is clear evidence that such patients are under-treated and under-represented or even excluded from clinical studies and there are no reliable and prospective data on the feasibility and efficacy of an oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based chemotherapy in this setting, we have tested the L-OHP plus oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and oral folinic acid (FA) combination as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) aged 70 or older. Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients with advanced or MCRC, aged over 70, were treated with L-OHP 65 mg/m2 as an intravenous 3-hour infusion on day 1 and 8 plus UFT 300 mg/m2 and FA 90 mg in 3 divided doses given orally on days 1–14 for each 3-week cycle. Patients were followed by a geriatric and a quality of life (QoL) assessment with specific scales and EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 45 for response to treatment. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (4%) and partial response in 22 (47%) [overall response rate, 51%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 40.7–61.2%]; 18 patients (38%) had stable disease, and 5 (11%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months (range, 3–19+ months). After a minimum follow-up of 17 months, the median time to disease progression and the median overall survival were 8.0 (95% CI: 6.7–9.3%) and 14.1 (95% CI: 11.0–17.1%) months, respectively. Regimen safety was manageable. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and this did not result in QoL impairment. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (17%), neutro- and thrombocytopenia (2%), laryngeal spasm (2%), and peripheral neuropathy (12.7%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: These results confirmed that this tested chemotherapy combination is active with acceptable tolerability and QoL maintenance in elderly patients with advanced or MCRC.
“…The occurrence of severe adverse events, including neutropenia [ 11 , 12 ], mucositis [ 13 ], neurotoxicity [ 14 ] and diarrhea [ 15 ], during cancer chemotherapy results in impaired patient quality of life and leads to the therapy interruption or dose reduction. The latter may lead to a reduction in the therapeutic effect due to the decrease in the relative dose intensity (RDI).…”
While modified FOLFIRINOX therapy is effective for treating advanced pancreatic cancer, it frequently causes severe neutropenia. The present study investigated the effect of severe neutropenia on clinical outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer patients who received modified FOLFIRINOX. The study subjects were 51 patients (30 males and 21 females) with advanced pancreatic cancer who received modified FOLFIRINOX (2h bolus injection of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2, 2 h bolus injection of L-leucovorin at 200 mg/m2, 90min bolus injection of irinotecan at 150 mg/m2, followed by continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil for 46 h at 2400 mg/m2 without bolus 5-fluorouracil) during the period from January 2014 to May 2018. No patients had prior history of chemotherapy. Adverse events, including neutropenia, were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Median overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, while median time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), and the incidence of other adverse events were secondary endpoints. Severe neutropenia (grade ≥3) occurred in 39 patients (76.4%), and Cox proportional hazard analysis identified high total bilirubin level as a significant risk factor. Median duration of OS was significantly longer in patients with severe neutropenia than in those without it (21.3 months versus 8.9 months, p = 0.020). Moreover, there was a significant correlation between OS and the grade of neutropenia (r = 0.306, p = 0.029). ORR tended to be higher, though not significantly, in patients with severe neutropenia. In contrast, the incidence rates of other adverse events were not different between the two groups. Severe neutropenia is an independent predictor of prognosis in advanced pancreatic cancer patients received modified FOLFIRINOX therapy.
“…It is sensitive to chemotherapy and possible to be completely remitted remission of it is possible by surgical procedure removal, the prognosis of advanced or relapsed colorectal cancer is not satisfactory[1]. Discovered some 40 years ago, Fluorouracil (FU) is still the most extensively studied drug and is considered to be the standard treatment in colorectal cancer especially in advanced cancer[2]. In recent years, 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), leucovorin, oxaliplatin and cisplatin combination chemotherapy is one of the most effective regimen in advanced colon cancer[3].…”
BackgroundThe aim of this study is to examine the safety and distribution of Ad-EGFP-MDR1, an adenovirus encoding human multidurg resistance gene (human MDR1), in the mice colon carcinoma model.MethodsAfter bone marrow cells (BMCs) were infected with Ad-EGFP-MDR1, they were administered by intra bone marrow-bone marrow transplantation (IBM-BMT). Total adenovirus antibody and serum adenovirus neutralizing factor (SNF) were determined. Biodistribution of Ad-EGFP-MDR1 was detected by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. The peripheral hematocyte white blood cell (WBC), haemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (Plt) counts were analyzed.ResultsNeither total adenovirus antibody nor SNF increased weeks after BMT. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry demonstrated concordant expression of human MDR1 and P-gp which were found in lung, intestine, kidney and BMCs after BMT, but not detected in liver, spleen, brain and tumor. No significant abnormality of the recovery hematocyte was observed on Day 30 after treatment.ConclusionThe results indicate that IBM-BMT administration of a replication defective adenovirus is a feasible mode of delivery, allowing exogenous transference. The findings in this study are conducted for the future long-term studies of safety assessment of Ad-EGFP-MDR1.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.