2015
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of rontalizumab (rhuMAb interferon-α) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (ROSE)

Abstract: NCT00962832.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
173
2
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
173
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This group also had higher trough concentrations of rontalizumab, suggesting that the inefficacy in the IFN signature high group may have been due to under-dosing. However, this was not reflected in attenuation of ISG expression, which was similar in both groups (120). Other strategies directly targeted pDCs, the main source of IFN-I.…”
Section: Rheumatoid Arthritismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group also had higher trough concentrations of rontalizumab, suggesting that the inefficacy in the IFN signature high group may have been due to under-dosing. However, this was not reflected in attenuation of ISG expression, which was similar in both groups (120). Other strategies directly targeted pDCs, the main source of IFN-I.…”
Section: Rheumatoid Arthritismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no clear explanation for this finding, which may require confirmation by other studies. One possibility is that patients with low ISM may be less refractory to treatment than patients with high ISM [97].…”
Section: Rontalizumabmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The primary endpoint was not achieved in the phase-II trial of the anti-IFNα mAb, rontalizumab [79], whereas the primary endpoint (assessed at week 52) was achieved in the phase-IIb trial of a different anti-IFNα mAb, sifalimumab. In this latter trial, the absolute percentage difference in clinical response between patients treated with the highest dose of sifalimumab and those treated with placebo was 14% [80], similar to the absolute percentage differences observed in the successful trial with belimumab or tabalumab.…”
Section: ) Targeting Of Baff Receptors Rather Than Of Baffmentioning
confidence: 97%