2010
DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e3181e8b3a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase II, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) Versus Pemetrexed in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Failed One or Two Prior Chemotherapeutic Regimens

Abstract: Oral AZD6244 showed clinical activity as second- or third-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. In an unselected NSCLC population, there is no suggestion that AZD6244 monotherapy offers any advantage over standard treatment with pemetrexed. Based on preclinical data and recent clinical observations, further development of AZD6244 in NSCLC should focus on BRAF or RAS mutation-positive patients and/or AZD6244-based combination regimens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
94
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AZD6244 is a potent, selective, and orally available MEK1/2 inhibitor. Previous studies have shown that the inhibition of MEK1/2 can induce apoptosis by inhibiting ERK-mediated B-cell lymphoma 2 phosphorylation and stabilization (16,17). Currently available MEK1/2 inhibitors have shown moderate single-agent activity in various tumors (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AZD6244 is a potent, selective, and orally available MEK1/2 inhibitor. Previous studies have shown that the inhibition of MEK1/2 can induce apoptosis by inhibiting ERK-mediated B-cell lymphoma 2 phosphorylation and stabilization (16,17). Currently available MEK1/2 inhibitors have shown moderate single-agent activity in various tumors (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23] Further, AZD6244 is a noncompetitive MEK inhibitor with preclinical antitumor activity in solid tumor models including hepatocellular, colon, myeloma, thyroid, pancreatic, melanoma, and breast cancers 19,20,41 and tested clinically in phase 1 24 and phase 2 trials of advanced, refractory colorectal, melanoma, and lung cancer. [25][26][27] AZD6244 has been examined in leukemia and myeloma models, [42][43][44] however to our knowledge, has never been tested in lymphoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23] Furthermore, phase 1 and phase 2 solid tumor clinical trials have shown this agent to be well-tolerated and have encouraging clinical efficacy. [24][25][26][27] To our knowledge, minimal data are available on newer generation MEK inhibitors in lymphoma and moreover, this anti-MEK agent has never been examined in lymphoma. We sought to examine the mechanisms of action and cytotoxic effect of the novel 2nd generation MEK small molecule antagonist, AZD6244, in lymphoma cell lines, primary cells, and an in vivo human DLBCL xenograft model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ihle and colleagues reported that patients with NSCLC whose tumors had either KRAS-G12C or KRAS-G12V mutations had worse progression-free survival (PFS) compared with patients whose tumors had other KRASmutant tumors or lacked KRAS mutations (17). In lung cancer, a randomized phase II study evaluated selumetinib or pemetrexed in previously treated NSCLC, and demonstrated that the PFS in the selumetinib group was equivalent to that in the pemetrexed group, although this was a study of unselected patients with NSCLC (37). In contrast, a small study also examined the efficacy of selumetinib specifically in KRAS-mutant NSCLC, but demonstrated no responses (38).…”
Section: Clinical-translational Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%