2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-010-9392-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase II, open-label, randomised study to assess the efficacy and safety of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) versus capecitabine monotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer who have failed one or two prior chemotherapeutic regimens

Abstract: AZD6244 showed similar efficacy to capecitabine in terms of the number of patients with a disease progression event and of progression-free survival. AZD6244 is currently undergoing evaluation in Phase II trials in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23] Further, AZD6244 is a noncompetitive MEK inhibitor with preclinical antitumor activity in solid tumor models including hepatocellular, colon, myeloma, thyroid, pancreatic, melanoma, and breast cancers 19,20,41 and tested clinically in phase 1 24 and phase 2 trials of advanced, refractory colorectal, melanoma, and lung cancer. [25][26][27] AZD6244 has been examined in leukemia and myeloma models, [42][43][44] however to our knowledge, has never been tested in lymphoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23] Further, AZD6244 is a noncompetitive MEK inhibitor with preclinical antitumor activity in solid tumor models including hepatocellular, colon, myeloma, thyroid, pancreatic, melanoma, and breast cancers 19,20,41 and tested clinically in phase 1 24 and phase 2 trials of advanced, refractory colorectal, melanoma, and lung cancer. [25][26][27] AZD6244 has been examined in leukemia and myeloma models, [42][43][44] however to our knowledge, has never been tested in lymphoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23] Furthermore, phase 1 and phase 2 solid tumor clinical trials have shown this agent to be well-tolerated and have encouraging clinical efficacy. [24][25][26][27] To our knowledge, minimal data are available on newer generation MEK inhibitors in lymphoma and moreover, this anti-MEK agent has never been examined in lymphoma. We sought to examine the mechanisms of action and cytotoxic effect of the novel 2nd generation MEK small molecule antagonist, AZD6244, in lymphoma cell lines, primary cells, and an in vivo human DLBCL xenograft model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, 6 Inhibitors of MEK have demonstrated efficacy against malignant tumors characterized by mutations in either RAS or Raf in preclinical models, and early development candidates including GSK1120212, 7 AZD6244, 8 and PD0325901 (2) 9 have further demonstrated evidence of activity in the clinical setting as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase II and III trials of single agent trametinib have suggested efficacy in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma who had not received previous BRAF inhibitor therapy [6] but not in those patients resistant to BRAF inhibition. In contrast, a series of phase II studies of other MEK inhibitors have shown limited evidence of efficacy in numerous settings, including treatment of cancers with high known incidence of dysregulated MAPK signalling [21][22][23][24][25] and selection of individuals with known BRAF-mutated tumours [26]. It is, therefore, likely that this class of agents will be used in rationally chosen combination therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%