2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase II clinical and pharmacodynamic study of temsirolimus in advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas

Abstract: Standard cytotoxic treatments for neuroendocrine tumours have been associated with limited activity and remarkable toxicity. A phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of temsirolimus in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Thirty-seven patients with advanced progressive NEC received intravenous weekly doses of 25 mg of temsirolimus. Patients were evaluated for tumour response, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE). T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
166
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
166
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our preclinical data would suggest that the more effective component in the everolimus and octreotide combination regimen may be the mTOR inhibitor. Notably, results from a multicenter phase II study of weekly temsirolimus in advanced progressive neuroendocrine tumors has recently been published (Duran et al 2006). Single agent temsirolimus demonstrated some clinical activity in this population: two patients (5.4%) achieved a confirmed partial response and a third patient had an unconfirmed partial response at the end of cycle 8 but discontinued therapy (not due to toxicity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our preclinical data would suggest that the more effective component in the everolimus and octreotide combination regimen may be the mTOR inhibitor. Notably, results from a multicenter phase II study of weekly temsirolimus in advanced progressive neuroendocrine tumors has recently been published (Duran et al 2006). Single agent temsirolimus demonstrated some clinical activity in this population: two patients (5.4%) achieved a confirmed partial response and a third patient had an unconfirmed partial response at the end of cycle 8 but discontinued therapy (not due to toxicity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, determination of OBD for mTOR inhibitors is still elusive because there is currently no standard surrogate marker available for translating preclinical research results into clinical practice. In previous studies the phosphorylation status of mTOR targets such as S6 protein from surrogate tissue or tumour samples has been commonly used as a marker of mTOR kinase activity and the degree of mTOR inhibition (Boulay et al, 2004;Duran et al, 2006). Similarly, decreases of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in tumour samples have been correlated with mTOR inhibitor activity (Neshat et al, 2001;Tabernero et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weekly intravenous temsirolimus was associated with a response rate of 5.6% in a study of 37 patients with advanced progressive NET. Outcomes were similar between patients with carcinoid and PNET [41].…”
Section: Mtormentioning
confidence: 64%