2006
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase I Study on Adoptive Immunotherapy Using Gene-Modified T Cells for Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: Purpose: A phase I study was conducted to assess the safety of adoptive immunotherapy using gene-modified autologousTcells for the treatment of metastatic ovarian cancer. Experimental Design: T cells with reactivity against the ovarian cancer^associated antigen a-folate receptor (FR) were generated by genetic modification of autologous T cells with a chimeric gene incorporating an anti-FR single-chain antibody linked to the signaling domain of the Fc receptor g chain. Patients were assigned to one of two cohor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
848
2
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,057 publications
(868 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
848
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, each 20 g mouse received approximately 2 Â 10 6 transduced T cells (1 Â 10 8 cells kg À1 ), which is comparable to the dose per kg of gene-modified T cells given to patients. 10,40,41 However, the absolute number of genemodified T cells was considerably less than that used in the clinic. Thus, although there is evidence that there can be close agreement between the transforming potential of retroviral vectors in mouse and human stem cells despite the delivery of much reduced absolute numbers of transduced stem cells in mice, 22,28 it should be noted that this may not be the case when considering T cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, each 20 g mouse received approximately 2 Â 10 6 transduced T cells (1 Â 10 8 cells kg À1 ), which is comparable to the dose per kg of gene-modified T cells given to patients. 10,40,41 However, the absolute number of genemodified T cells was considerably less than that used in the clinic. Thus, although there is evidence that there can be close agreement between the transforming potential of retroviral vectors in mouse and human stem cells despite the delivery of much reduced absolute numbers of transduced stem cells in mice, 22,28 it should be noted that this may not be the case when considering T cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Patient-derived T cells are retrovirally engineered ex vivo to express a recombinant T-cell receptor or, alternatively, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR, immunoreceptor), amplified and re-infused to recognize and to destroy tumour lesions by their cytolytic capacities. In contrast to recombinant T-cell receptors, CARs consist of a single polypeptide chain with an antibody-derived single chain fragment (scFv) in the extracellular moiety for binding and the CD3z or combined CD28-CD3z signalling domain in the intracellular moiety for T-cell activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Both sustained survival and increased amplification result in a prolonged redirected T-cell response and in an improved antitumor attack, making second-generation CARs favorable for clinical use. [11][12][13] In physiological activation of naïve T cells, CD28 recruitment by B7 engagement sustains formation of the immunological synapse, thereby lowering the antigen threshold and increasing T-cell activation. In physiological T-cell activation, the activation efficiency correlates with the T-cell receptor (TCR) avidity to the cognate peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%