In the October 31, 2013, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Von Hoff et al 1 published an important article describing the results of a randomized clinical trial conducted in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that compared gemcitabine with a combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. In this trial, 861 patients were randomly assigned: 431 to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and 430 to gemcitabine alone. The high-level results demonstrated a median overall survival of 8.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with 6.7 months in the gemcitabine group. The hazard ratio for death was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.83; P Ͻ .001). Other end points, including progression-free survival and response rate, were superior with the combination. Grade Ն 3 neutropenia occurred in 38% of the patients treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, with 3% of these instances resulting in febrile neutropenia. Twenty-six percent of the patients received growth factors. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy occurred in 17% of the patients treated with nab-paclitaxel, and it was managed with temporary discontinuation of nab-paclitaxel followed by a reduction in dose. Overall, however, 71% of the nab-paclitaxel doses were delivered at the intended starting dose.
1On the basis of these results, there are now two combination cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens with activity in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and the combination of fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin known as FOLFIRINOX. The pivotal FOLFIRINOX trial (Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive 4/Action Clinique Coordonnées en Cancérologie Digestive 11 [PRODIGE4/ACCORD 11]) also targeted patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, randomly assigning 342 patients to receive FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine. In that trial, the median overall survival was 11.2 months for patients treated with FOLFIRINOX and 6.8 months for patients treated with gemcitabine. However, despite the encouraging efficacy of FOLFIRINOX, the challenge with this regimen is its toxicity, with 46% of the FOLFIRINOXtreated patients developing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 5% febrile neutropenia, and 42% requiring growth factor support with filgrastim. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and sensory neuropathy were also significantly higher in the FOLFIRINOX group.2 However, despite the higher rates of adverse events with FOLFIRINOX relative to gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX conferred a benefit by slowing deterioration in quality of life, presumably because of the anticancer activity of the regimen.Recognizing the limitations of cross-trial comparisons, practicing oncologists are now faced with the question of which of these two regimens should be considered for the first-line management of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Both regimens are clearly active. As described in the reports, there are differences in the patient populations being treated. For example, patients treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel compared with patient...