2010
DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2010.543697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase I study of the oral platinum agent satraplatin in sequential combination with capecitabine in the treatment of patients with advanced solid malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there were some differences in DNA‐binding mode: (a) the aquation rate of JM118 was slower than that of cisplatin; (b) DNA bending from 1, 2‐GG intrastrand adduct of JM118 was lower than cisplatin; (c) DNA‐protein cross‐linking efficiency was higher for JM118 than cisplatin . Although satraplatin was effective against various cancer cells in vitro, satraplatin was mainly used in the treatment of prostate cancer in clinic, and was evaluated in a pivotal phase 3 clinical trial as second‐line therapy for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer . The dose‐limiting satraplatin toxicities included nausea, vomiting, and myelosuppression, but renal and neurologic toxicities were seldom reported …”
Section: Platinum (Iv) Complex‐based Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there were some differences in DNA‐binding mode: (a) the aquation rate of JM118 was slower than that of cisplatin; (b) DNA bending from 1, 2‐GG intrastrand adduct of JM118 was lower than cisplatin; (c) DNA‐protein cross‐linking efficiency was higher for JM118 than cisplatin . Although satraplatin was effective against various cancer cells in vitro, satraplatin was mainly used in the treatment of prostate cancer in clinic, and was evaluated in a pivotal phase 3 clinical trial as second‐line therapy for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer . The dose‐limiting satraplatin toxicities included nausea, vomiting, and myelosuppression, but renal and neurologic toxicities were seldom reported …”
Section: Platinum (Iv) Complex‐based Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…92,95,96 Although satraplatin was effective against various cancer cells in vitro, 92,[97][98][99] satraplatin was mainly used in the treatment of prostate cancer in clinic, and was evaluated in a pivotal phase 3 clinical trial as second-line therapy for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. 90,[100][101][102] The dose-limiting satraplatin toxicities included nausea, vomiting, and myelosuppression, but renal and neurologic toxicities were seldom reported. 69,103…”
Section: B Pt (Iv) Complexes In Clinical Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another trial evaluated the combination of oral V with another oral drug, capecitabine, showing a good profile of tolerability and similar toxicities, mainly nausea, diarrhea and neutropenia [20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beispielsweise wurden Goldkomplexe zur Behandlung rheumatoider Arthritis entwickelt, Silberkomplexe als antimikrobische Wirkstoffe, Antimonkomplexe zur Behandlung von Leishmaniose, Vanadium(IV)-Komplexe als antivirale und antidiabetische Wirkstoffe, [2][3][4][5] Arsentrioxid (Trisenox) zur Behandlung akuter Promyelozytenleukämie [6] und metallaktiviertes Bleomycin zur Behandlung des Hodgkin-Lymphoms und von Hodenkrebs. [7] Auf Übergangsmetallen basierende Therapeutika, die sich zurzeit in klinischen Studien befinden, umfassen die dritte Generation von antitumoralen Platinkomplexen wie liposomales Cisplatin (Lipoplatin), Satraplatin und Picoplatin, [8,9] die antitumoralen Rutheniumkomplexe NAMI-A und KP-1019 [10] und den Antimalaria-Wirkstoff Ferroquin, ein Ferrocen-Chinolin-Konjugat. [11] Diese Beispiele führen die lange Geschichte therapeutischer Metallkomplexe fort und wecken die Hoffnung, dass das Gebiet der anorganischen Medizin sich in Zukunft energisch weiterentwickeln wird.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified