2003
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.08.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Phase I Study of Irinotecan As a 3-Week Schedule in Children With Refractory or Recurrent Solid Tumors

Abstract: The recommended phase II dose of CPT-11 in a 3-week schedule is 600 mg/m2 in less heavily, and heavily pretreated children with solid tumors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar effects have been reported for topotecan, the topoisomerase I inhibitor, which induced tumor regression and a significant tumor growth delay in animals bearing NB xenografts (Vassal et al, 1997). Initial phase I trials of CPT-11 in children evaluated several doses and schedules and some partial responses or disease stabilization were reported in patients with NB (Furman et al, 1999;Blaney et al, 2001;Vassal et al, 2003). However, in a European phase II study in children with relapsed or refractory NB, CPT-11 showed no clinically useful activity (Vassal et al, 2002), suggesting the presence of drug resistance mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Similar effects have been reported for topotecan, the topoisomerase I inhibitor, which induced tumor regression and a significant tumor growth delay in animals bearing NB xenografts (Vassal et al, 1997). Initial phase I trials of CPT-11 in children evaluated several doses and schedules and some partial responses or disease stabilization were reported in patients with NB (Furman et al, 1999;Blaney et al, 2001;Vassal et al, 2003). However, in a European phase II study in children with relapsed or refractory NB, CPT-11 showed no clinically useful activity (Vassal et al, 2002), suggesting the presence of drug resistance mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…20 -22 A smaller number of children with gliomas have also received this agent. In 2 Phase I pediatric studies, which included a total of 8 children with recurrent high-grade glioma and 3 children with recurrent brainstem glioma, 23,24 irinotecan was administered intravenously every 3 weeks as a single dose or as multiple doses given over 5 consecutive days. One patient with highgrade glioma experienced a PR, and SD was documented in five patients with high-grade glioma and one patient with brainstem glioma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to small numbers of patients, phase I and II studies are slow to run, and ethical concerns may lead to reluctance to enroll young patients. It is clear, however, that in childhood, toxicities may be different from those in adults (Doz et al, 2001) and that the tolerance of children may be better (Vassal et al, 2003). When a DLT has been defined in adults, it should be also defined in a paediatric cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%