2015
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.12648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, allopurinol-controlled study assessing the safety and efficacy of oral febuxostat in Chinese gout patients with hyperuricemia

Abstract: Febuxostat 80 mg/day had superior urate-lowering efficacy to that of febuxostat 40 mg/day or allopurinol 300 mg/day, which was comparable in Chinese gout patients with hyperuricemia. Febuxostat, at a daily dose of 40 or 80 mg, was safe and well tolerated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(87 reference statements)
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the previous reports, 25,26) the serum urate lowering efficacy of febuxostat was observed at an early stage, and the serum urate level was stable at 4 weeks or later (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar to the previous reports, 25,26) the serum urate lowering efficacy of febuxostat was observed at an early stage, and the serum urate level was stable at 4 weeks or later (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The duration of the trials ranged from 4 to 52 weeks. Seven trials made a comparison between allopurinol and febuxostat1353637384647, two trials between allopurinol and benzbromarone4143, one trial between benzbromarone and probenecid42, three trials between febuxostat and placebo343940, and one trial between pegloticase and placebo45. A three-arm trial compared allopurinol, febuxostat and placebo44.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any inconsistencies were resolved by discussion among the three authors. Finally, we identified fifteen qualified RCTs that were included in the current analysis13435363738394041424344454647. The complete process and the exclusion reasons are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Occurrence of adverse events in dependence on therapy duration (n (therapy duration up to one week) = 332; n (therapy duration over one week to one month) = 6525; n (therapy duration over one month to six months) = 3170; n (therapy duration over six months to one year) = 1297; n (therapy duration over one year) = 917; per therapy period differentiation between patients with at least one side effect (column 1), patients with at least one severe side effect (column 2), patients who dropped out of the study prematurely (column 3)) [ 2 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ...…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%