1997
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.19970160307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pharmacophore Model for PDE IV Inhibitors

Abstract: Based on conformational analysis and GRID-contour calculations we developed a common primary pharmacophore for rolipram analog, nitraquazone and xanthine derivative PDE IV inhibitors. In spite of the structural differences exhibited by the three substance classes we could provide evidence that they share common hydrogen bonding and lipophilic enzyme binding sites.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibitors of type IV phosphodiesterase (PDE) are considered as perspective anti-inflammatory and antidepressant drugs, among which are well-known rolipram (IC 50 = 175 nM), Ro 20-1724 , (IC 50 = 1590 nM) and cilomilast ,, (IC 50 = 92 nM). 7-[3-(Cyclopentyloxy)-4-methoxyphenyl]hexahydro-3 H -pyrrolizin-3-one 1 (Scheme ) introduced by GlaxoSmithKline is a highly selective PDE IV inhibitor (IC 50 = 63 nM) several times more potent than rolipram .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitors of type IV phosphodiesterase (PDE) are considered as perspective anti-inflammatory and antidepressant drugs, among which are well-known rolipram (IC 50 = 175 nM), Ro 20-1724 , (IC 50 = 1590 nM) and cilomilast ,, (IC 50 = 92 nM). 7-[3-(Cyclopentyloxy)-4-methoxyphenyl]hexahydro-3 H -pyrrolizin-3-one 1 (Scheme ) introduced by GlaxoSmithKline is a highly selective PDE IV inhibitor (IC 50 = 63 nM) several times more potent than rolipram .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, AL is a hydrogen bond acceptor atom, such as an ether or a carbonyl oxygen, HY is a hydrophobic center, such as the center of a phenyl or heterocyclic ring, DS are two hydrogen bond donor sites hypothesized as being present in the biological counterpart, in correspondence to AL sites on the ligand. The four pharmacophoric points de®ned by Model A do not give any new information regarding the knowledge of PDE4 catalytic site, however they con®rm those features described by previous models such as a relatively¯at topography (Marivet et al) [3] and a hydrogen bond acceptor atom adjacent to a lipophilic pocket (Polymeropoulos et al) [4,6]. Furthermore, it is interesting to note how these features partially match those displayed by low selective PDE3 inhibitors [31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The structures were aligned to a ®rst approximation by calculating GRID-contours [9] for hydrogen donor sites as described in ref. 3. PrGen generates vectors (H-extension, lone-pair, hydrophobicity) for all functional groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural variation of PDE 4 inhibitors has been limited mainly to three types of compounds: rolipram and nitraquazone analogues and xanthine derivatives. The structural requirements for inhibiting catalytic activity have been recently analyzed by calculating GRID-contours for hydrogen donor binding sites [3]. The resulting pharmacophore hypothesis is schematically shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%