2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02916204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Petrov-Galerkin Natural Element Method Securing the Numerical Integration Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These functions called Laplace interpolation function (or nonSibsonian interpolation function) [9,10] possess several useful properties like the Kronecker delta property, as Lagrange interpolation functions used in finite element method. Thanks to these properties, the essential boundary condition can be easily and accurately enforced [11,12], as in the finite element method. Meanwhile, the natural element method does not require extra effort to generate the background cell, because it utilize a set of Delaunay triangles, which are automatically identified in process of the basis function definition, as its background cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These functions called Laplace interpolation function (or nonSibsonian interpolation function) [9,10] possess several useful properties like the Kronecker delta property, as Lagrange interpolation functions used in finite element method. Thanks to these properties, the essential boundary condition can be easily and accurately enforced [11,12], as in the finite element method. Meanwhile, the natural element method does not require extra effort to generate the background cell, because it utilize a set of Delaunay triangles, which are automatically identified in process of the basis function definition, as its background cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sukumar et al [11,13] applied it to various problems in two-dimensional linear elastostatics to examine its accuracy and robustness, and they tried to couple finite element method with the natural element method. Cho and Lee [12] introduced a Petrov-Galerkin natural element method providing the best convergence rate in unconstrained two-dimensional linear elasticity problems in both convex and non-convex domains. Through the application to linear vibration and wave propagation problems, Bueche et al [14] confirmed that the overall performance of the natural element method in linear elastodynamics is better than the linear finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile contacts contribute negatively to the average pressure of the medium. The average pressure is given classically by (5) (6) a .. = (ria)…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the support of / I is defined as the intersection of the convex hull x CH ð@Þ (i.e. the problem domain x) and the union [cirðD IJK Þ of Delaunay circumcircles defined by the node x I and its neighbor nodes: The detailed discussion on the properties of Laplace interpolation functions may be referred to our previous paper (Cho and Lee, 2006a). As well, the behavior of Laplace interpolation functions corresponding to the boundary nodes and the adjacent interior nodes will be partially discussed in Section 4.3.…”
Section: Voronoi Polygons and Laplace Interpolation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The reader may refer to Cho and Lee (2006a) for the detailed explanation of the numerical integration in the natural element method. On the other hand, the calculation of K I are straightforward once B I are line-integrated.…”
Section: Direct Differentiation Of R X Wmentioning
confidence: 99%