2018
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoy052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A perspective on sensory drive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the theory of sensory-driven speciation, differences in important sensory traits can lead to assortative mating and reproductive isolation among populations (Fuller & Endler, 2018;Kawata et al, 2007;Matsumoto, Terai, Okada, & Tachida, 2014;Puechmaille et al, 2011). Under the hypothesis of sensory-driven speciation, genetic divergence is directly correlated with sensory divergence, which causes a pattern that we call "isolation by sensory variation" (IBS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the theory of sensory-driven speciation, differences in important sensory traits can lead to assortative mating and reproductive isolation among populations (Fuller & Endler, 2018;Kawata et al, 2007;Matsumoto, Terai, Okada, & Tachida, 2014;Puechmaille et al, 2011). Under the hypothesis of sensory-driven speciation, genetic divergence is directly correlated with sensory divergence, which causes a pattern that we call "isolation by sensory variation" (IBS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing numbers of studies have provided empirical support for the importance of sensory drive in the speciation process (Boughman, 2002; Kawata, Shoji, Kawamura, & Seehausen, 2007; Puechmaille et al., 2011; Seehausen et al., 2008; Tobias et al., 2010). According to the theory of sensory‐driven speciation, differences in important sensory traits can lead to assortative mating and reproductive isolation among populations (Fuller & Endler, 2018; Kawata et al., 2007; Matsumoto, Terai, Okada, & Tachida, 2014; Puechmaille et al., 2011). Under the hypothesis of sensory‐driven speciation, genetic divergence is directly correlated with sensory divergence, which causes a pattern that we call “isolation by sensory variation” (IBS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensory drive theory highlights this evolutionary relationship by predicting that communication signals evolve in response to both the sensory systems of their receivers and the habitat conditions under which signals are emitted and perceived (Endler, 1992). Endler’s proposal of sensory drive in 1992 has inspired an enormous body of research that has been foundational to our understanding of signal evolution and speciation in animals (Endler, 1992; Endler & Basolo, 1998; Boughman, 2002; Cummings & Endler, 2018; Fuller & Endler, 2018). Flowering plants use communication signals that mediate interactions with animal pollinators – pollinators identify flowers in a complex visual and olfactory landscape based on traits like color, shape, size, and scent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kayser, 2018). However, the potential to detect novel chemicals and predict their bioactivity against molecular targets is limited by the biases of the sensory drives in the model organisms we use in biomedicine, such as fruit flies, rats, mice, and humans (Fuller and Endler, 2018;Yohe and Brand, 2018;Renoult and Mendelson, 2019). In contrast to model systems, wild systems curated over evolutionary time provide novel and potentially highly targeted chemical solutions to combat a greater diversity of pests (Jones et al, 1991;Bednarek and Osbourn, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical coping behaviors by wild species provide unique sensory drives that have been established by tight associations with the chemical sources they exploit (Higham and Hebets, 2013). Chemicals can be detected and processed uniquely within each taxon because of different phylogenetic sensory investments (Fuller and Endler, 2018). For example, many avian species depend on both visual and olfactory cues from their environment for foraging and identifying natal grounds (DeBose and Nevitt, 2008;Corfield et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%