1983
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1983.4767365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Perspective on Range Finding Techniques for Computer Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
171
0
9

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 689 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
171
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact methods use mechanical contact through a trigger or scanning probe at the end of an arm or the column of a CMM (Jarvis, 1983) to obtain surface geometrical information. Development of this method was driven by reverse engineering (Milroy et al, 1996;Dalton, 1998;Chow, 1997).…”
Section: Nonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact methods use mechanical contact through a trigger or scanning probe at the end of an arm or the column of a CMM (Jarvis, 1983) to obtain surface geometrical information. Development of this method was driven by reverse engineering (Milroy et al, 1996;Dalton, 1998;Chow, 1997).…”
Section: Nonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques for depth determination exist [33], and could perhaps be categorized as static, using cues such as lighting or texture, and triangulation based where multiple views from moving cameras or stereo camera pairs are interpreted. The technique outlined here is a simple static technique based on a priori knowledge of the target object's area.…”
Section: Depth Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling the 3D geometry of real objects or scenes is a challenging task that has seen a variety of tools and approaches applied such as Computer Aided Design (CAD) tools [3], arm-mounted probes, active methods [110,131,11,10] and passive image-based methods [162,165,176]. Among all, passive image-based methods, the subject of this tutorial, provide a fast way of capturing accurate 3D content at a fraction of the cost of other approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%