2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A personalized ellipsoid modeling method and matching error analysis for the artificial femoral head design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although his classification has been known for over 40 years, many computer-aided orthopedic surgery methodologies still remain faithful to the spherical classification. On the other hand, several studies have considered nonspherical shapes but none were truly ovoidal [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Generic ovoidal shapes could contribute significantly to the anatomical description of human joints and to design improved artificial joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although his classification has been known for over 40 years, many computer-aided orthopedic surgery methodologies still remain faithful to the spherical classification. On the other hand, several studies have considered nonspherical shapes but none were truly ovoidal [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Generic ovoidal shapes could contribute significantly to the anatomical description of human joints and to design improved artificial joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For spheroidal articular surfaces, such as the humeral and femoral heads, the standard classification regarding shape modeling is that these surfaces can be represented by spherical shapes [1][2][3]. Despite this classification, several authors within the orthopedic surgery and prosthetic design communities have noted that the femoral head and acetabular cavity are not clearly spherical, but are actually more complex in shape exhibiting quasihomogeneous curvatures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Most of these studies use spheres and ellipsoids to describe the shapes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], although some consider conchoids [4,7,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other considerations have fostered the research on alternative methods for incorporating uncertainty in the structural analysis, such as fuzzy sets and related theories [95], anti-optimization or convex-set modeling [96], interval analysis [97], random sets [98], ellipsoid modeling [99,100] and worstcase scenarios [101]. Comparisons have been also made between probabilistic and alternative methods [102] or their combination has been explored [103,104].…”
Section: The Methods Of Reliability Theory Of Building Construction Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, the proposed thickness measurement is more likely to be applicable for the hip joint with the spherical-like femoral head, which could be in early and/or less severe OA conditions without bony deformities of the femoral head. For the hip joint with the non-spherical femoral head such as in more severe OA states, a more dedicated model for the femoral head, e.g., an ellipsoid model (Liu et al 2014), will be needed to reduce the potential measurement errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%