Abstract:Financial exploitation and financial capacity issues often overlap when a gerontologist assesses whether an older adult’s financial decision is an autonomous, capable choice. Our goal is to describe a new conceptual model for assessing financial decisions using principles of person-centered approaches and to introduce a new instrument, the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS). We created a conceptual model, convened meetings of experts from various disciplines to critique the model and provide i… Show more
“…The development of the scale is described in Lichtenberg et al (2015a). The LFDRS consists of 77 multiple-choice questions with separate subscales that measure Financial Situational Awareness, Psychological Vulnerability, Undue Influence (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The older adults were consecutive cases seen by an elder law attorney Inter-rater reliability was established across 10 independent raters by having multiple raters view the videotapes and score the LFDRS. A complete description of the reliability procedures can be found in Lichtenberg et al (2015a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS; Lichtenberg, Stoltman, Ficker, Iris, & Mast, 2015a) applies Mast’s Whole Person Dementia Assessment method to the assessment of financial decision-making abilities (i.e., decisional abilities). The LFDRS examines the specific sentinel financial decisions an older adult is making and has made, and determines whether he or she has the requisite decisional abilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LFDRS examines the specific sentinel financial decisions an older adult is making and has made, and determines whether he or she has the requisite decisional abilities. Lichtenberg and colleagues (2015) have previously described the scale’s development and its reliability. In this study we provide data to support the concurrent validity of the LFDRS, including its overall rating, total risk score, and subscale risk scores for the assessment of financial exploitation and financial decisional abilities.…”
This study examines preliminary evidence for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS), a new person-centered approach to assessing capacity to make financial decisions, and its relationship to self-reported cases of financial exploitation in 69 older African Americans. More than one third of individuals reporting financial exploitation also had questionable decisional abilities. Overall, decisional ability score and current decision total were significantly associated with cognitive screening test and financial ability scores, demonstrating good criterion validity. Financially exploited individuals, and non-exploited individuals, showed mean group differences on the Mini Mental State Exam, Financial Situational Awareness, Psychological Vulnerability, Current Decisional Ability, and Susceptibility to undue influence subscales, and Total Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale Score. Study findings suggest that impaired decisional abilities may render older adults more vulnerable to financial exploitation, and that the LFDRS is a valid tool for measuring both decisional abilities and financial exploitation.
“…The development of the scale is described in Lichtenberg et al (2015a). The LFDRS consists of 77 multiple-choice questions with separate subscales that measure Financial Situational Awareness, Psychological Vulnerability, Undue Influence (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The older adults were consecutive cases seen by an elder law attorney Inter-rater reliability was established across 10 independent raters by having multiple raters view the videotapes and score the LFDRS. A complete description of the reliability procedures can be found in Lichtenberg et al (2015a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS; Lichtenberg, Stoltman, Ficker, Iris, & Mast, 2015a) applies Mast’s Whole Person Dementia Assessment method to the assessment of financial decision-making abilities (i.e., decisional abilities). The LFDRS examines the specific sentinel financial decisions an older adult is making and has made, and determines whether he or she has the requisite decisional abilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LFDRS examines the specific sentinel financial decisions an older adult is making and has made, and determines whether he or she has the requisite decisional abilities. Lichtenberg and colleagues (2015) have previously described the scale’s development and its reliability. In this study we provide data to support the concurrent validity of the LFDRS, including its overall rating, total risk score, and subscale risk scores for the assessment of financial exploitation and financial decisional abilities.…”
This study examines preliminary evidence for the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale (LFDRS), a new person-centered approach to assessing capacity to make financial decisions, and its relationship to self-reported cases of financial exploitation in 69 older African Americans. More than one third of individuals reporting financial exploitation also had questionable decisional abilities. Overall, decisional ability score and current decision total were significantly associated with cognitive screening test and financial ability scores, demonstrating good criterion validity. Financially exploited individuals, and non-exploited individuals, showed mean group differences on the Mini Mental State Exam, Financial Situational Awareness, Psychological Vulnerability, Current Decisional Ability, and Susceptibility to undue influence subscales, and Total Lichtenberg Financial Decision Rating Scale Score. Study findings suggest that impaired decisional abilities may render older adults more vulnerable to financial exploitation, and that the LFDRS is a valid tool for measuring both decisional abilities and financial exploitation.
“…These other instruments were developed on the basis of the conceptual framework of the FCI. Most instruments were developed in the USA (8) (72.7%) 5,15,21,[23][24][25][26][27] , (Chart 1). Chart 2 displays the instruments in terms of the form of assessment of the participants, as well as the design of the validation study, the objectives and the characteristics of scope.…”
Objective: To identify tools available in literature for assessing the financial management capacity of elderly persons with and without cognitive deficit or impairment. Methods: An integrative literature review was performed. Scientific publications indexed in the PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), Psychology Index and Cochrane Library databases by November 2015 were evaluated. Results: Of the 609 articles obtained from the databases, 29 were considered eligible for this review, and involved 11 instruments for the evaluation of financial management capacity, the most cited of which was the Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI). Conclusion: There are several scales and instruments available which are used to investigate both daily and instrumental activities of daily living, which allow the independence and effective functioning of the elderly on a day to day basis to be verified. Non-Brazilian literature also describes specific instruments for the assessment of financial management capacity. However, no references to a specific scale that evaluates this construct and which has been validated and adapted for the Brazilian population were identified.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.