2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Persian version of the parental bonding instrument: Factor structure and psychometric properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 13 Moreover, it is worth saying that the results obtained concern specifically the particular western cultural context, in which the research has been conducted, since parenting styles differ greatly between cultures. 36 38 The PBI overprotection factor in fact showed some cross-cultural inconsistencies, since the more collective eastern cultures, and in particular the Japanese and Chinese ones, do not assign a positive value to child independence and autonomy. 38 It is therefore likely that the positive link between high care and encouragement of freedom (low overprotection) may be specific only to western cultures, consequently representing a protective factor exclusively in these cultural contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 Moreover, it is worth saying that the results obtained concern specifically the particular western cultural context, in which the research has been conducted, since parenting styles differ greatly between cultures. 36 38 The PBI overprotection factor in fact showed some cross-cultural inconsistencies, since the more collective eastern cultures, and in particular the Japanese and Chinese ones, do not assign a positive value to child independence and autonomy. 38 It is therefore likely that the positive link between high care and encouragement of freedom (low overprotection) may be specific only to western cultures, consequently representing a protective factor exclusively in these cultural contexts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its widespread use, there is no consensus regarding the factor structure of the PBI. While some studies have confirmed the original two-factor structure ( Kitamura et al, 2009 ; Mackinnon, Henderson, Scott, & Duncan-Jones, 1989 ; Parker et al, 1979 ), other studies have suggested three- ( Cox, Enns, & Clara, 2000 ; Cubis, Lewin, & Dawes, 1989 ; Heider et al, 2005 ; E. Murphy, Brewin, & Silka, 1997 ; Sato et al, 1999 ) or four-factor solutions ( Behzadi & Parker, 2015 ; Liu, Li, & Fang, 2011 ; Uji, Tanaka, Shono, & Kitamura, 2006 ). In most previous studies converging on a three-factor solution, items within the control factor have been shown to form two distinct factors: (a) overprotection, consisting of items such as “[my mother/father] felt I could not look after myself unless she or he was around” and (b) autonomy, consisting of items such as “[my mother/father] let me decide things for myself.” In four-factor solutions, items originally measuring the care factor also separated into two dimensions, although this was observed mainly in non-European samples of Japanese ( Uji et al, 2006 ), Chinese ( Liu et al, 2011 ), and Persian respondents ( Behzadi & Parker, 2015 ).…”
Section: Psychometric Properties Of the Pbi And Methodological Challementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from cultural or linguistic differences, several methodological issues may explain these factor structure inconsistencies. While some studies relied on exploratory factor analytic (EFA) methods or principal component analyses (e.g., Gómez-Beneyto, Pedrós, Tomás, Aguilar, & Leal, 1993 ; E. Murphy et al, 1997 ), others utilized confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs, e.g., Behzadi & Parker, 2015 ; Terra et al, 2009 ; Tsaousis, Mascha, & Giovazolias, 2011 ). Although traditional EFA methods can be useful for determining the number of factors to retain, they typically do not provide goodness-of-fit information; it is therefore difficult to assess whether the model provides an adequate representation of the data.…”
Section: Psychometric Properties Of the Pbi And Methodological Challementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor structure and psychometric properties of the Persian version of PBI were also examined. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were all high, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 for the maternal and the paternal forms (Behzadi & Parker, 2015). Cronbach's alpha coefficient of maternal care and overprotection were 0.89 and 0.76, respectively in this study.…”
Section: Ruminative Response Scale (Rrs)mentioning
confidence: 96%