2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-009-9145-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A permutation test for umbrella alternatives

Abstract: There is a wide variety of stochastic ordering problems where K groups (typically ordered with respect to time) are observed along with a (continuous) response. The interest of the study may be on finding the change-point group, i.e. the group where an inversion of trend of the variable under study is observed. A change point is not merely a maximum (or a minimum) of the time-series function, but a further requirement is that the trend of the time-series is monotonically increasing before that point, and monot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we did not feel there was a need to increase the number of resamples and/or replications for our simulation study. Our use of the 1000/1000 setup also falls in line with the likes of Brombin and Salmaso [4] and Basso and Salmaso [2] which also use the same quantities of resamples and replications to reach their conclusions. Moreover in preliminary testing we found that using B = 500 produced overall results which is very similar to those of B = 1000 presented below, further indicating that 1000/1000 is more than enough to reach accurate bootstrap approximations in this setting.…”
Section: Designsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore we did not feel there was a need to increase the number of resamples and/or replications for our simulation study. Our use of the 1000/1000 setup also falls in line with the likes of Brombin and Salmaso [4] and Basso and Salmaso [2] which also use the same quantities of resamples and replications to reach their conclusions. Moreover in preliminary testing we found that using B = 500 produced overall results which is very similar to those of B = 1000 presented below, further indicating that 1000/1000 is more than enough to reach accurate bootstrap approximations in this setting.…”
Section: Designsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For umbrella and tree orderings, Mack and Wolfe (1981) proposed a test statistic, which is a weighted linear combination of standardized Mann-Whitney statistics and provided its null distribution in a wide variety of settings, while Magel and Qin (2003) proposed a test that extends the Chen and Wolfe (1990) test with an unknown peak for use with ranked-set sample data, and Lee and Chen (2001) generalized the Chen-Wolfe test based on a weighted Kaplan-Meier statistic for the peak-unknown umbrella alternative with right-censored survival data and also generalized the Mack-Wolfe test for right-censored data. Basso and Salmaso (2011) considered an approach conditional on the observed data, while Pardo, Lu, and Franco-Pereira (2019) proposed two families of test statistics for testing simple and umbrella stochastic orderings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, optimal subset procedures and weighted methods controlling the familywise error rate are proposed by Finos and Salmaso (2005), Finos and Salmaso (2006) and Finos and Salmaso (2007). Permutation tests for umbrella alternatives and multivariate problems are considered in Basso and Salmaso (2011) and Pesarin and Salmaso (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%