2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2008.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A performance study of uplink scheduling algorithms in point-to-multipoint WiMAX networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Each queue is serviced in a round robin order according to its weight. The queue with the highest priority weight takes to process more packets [6], [10]. However, the proposed mechanism uses WRR scheduling technique for two reasons, first, it allows avoiding the problem of resource starvation for lower priority classes, and the second, it gives the QoS guarantee in high-priority classes.…”
Section: Adaptive Scheduling With Dynamic Weight Adjustment (Awrr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each queue is serviced in a round robin order according to its weight. The queue with the highest priority weight takes to process more packets [6], [10]. However, the proposed mechanism uses WRR scheduling technique for two reasons, first, it allows avoiding the problem of resource starvation for lower priority classes, and the second, it gives the QoS guarantee in high-priority classes.…”
Section: Adaptive Scheduling With Dynamic Weight Adjustment (Awrr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned by [18], no single inheritance schedulers that can fulfill all the QoS requirements of the WiMAX network applications. The EDF+WFQ+FIFO scheduling algorithm was proposed to provide low-delay and packet loss for real-time applications [19].…”
Section: Edf+wfq+fifo Hybrid Algorithm Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their conclusion is that no algorithm dominates in all criteria such as average throughput or delay, frame utilisation, request honouring, or packet loss minimisation. However, the work of Ali, Dhrona, & Hassanein, H. (2009)) is not application specific and given the distinct possibility that WiMAX may dedicated to media services, further study is merited. Kim & Yeom, 2007 propose an uplink bandwidth allocation scheme for best effort TCP streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is not straightforward because the frame types in use can vary according to the codec profile. Ali, Dhrona, & Hassanein, H. (2009) try to survey all types of UL bandwidth allocation algorithm and evaluate these algorithms with respect to their abilities to support multiple classes of services and to optimise bandwidth utilization. Their conclusion is that no algorithm dominates in all criteria such as average throughput or delay, frame utilisation, request honouring, or packet loss minimisation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%