2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A performance evaluation model of a high concentration photovoltaic module with a fractional open circuit voltage-based maximum power point tracking algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the abovementioned, various looks into have been completed utilizing conventional calculations for the displaying and usage of MPPT controllers [5], of which coming up next are featured: bother plus watch (P&O) [6], [7], adjusted P&O [8], [9], fragmentary short out current [10], partial open circuit voltage [11], sliding mode control [12], [13] and gradual conductance [14]. The P&O calculation has been utilized generally, yet it has been demonstrated that this strategy has issues for following the MPP when there are unexpected change within sun powered irradiance [15].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the abovementioned, various looks into have been completed utilizing conventional calculations for the displaying and usage of MPPT controllers [5], of which coming up next are featured: bother plus watch (P&O) [6], [7], adjusted P&O [8], [9], fragmentary short out current [10], partial open circuit voltage [11], sliding mode control [12], [13] and gradual conductance [14]. The P&O calculation has been utilized generally, yet it has been demonstrated that this strategy has issues for following the MPP when there are unexpected change within sun powered irradiance [15].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the effect of temperature and irradiance changes, the light-generated current IPV, which depends linearly on the solar irradiance and is influenced by the temperature, should be corrected by = , + Δ (5) where IPV,STC is the light-generated current at STC, KI is the temperature coefficient of the current, G is the irradiance level on the cell surface, GSTC is 1000 W/m 2 , ∆ = − , and Tcell and TSTC are the actual temperature of the solar cell and 25 °C, respectively. In addition, the diode reverse saturation current I0 is strongly dependent on the temperature, and it can be modeled as [19] = , + Δ exp , + Δ − 1 (6) where ISC,STC and VOC,STC are the short circuit current and open circuit voltage at STC, respectively, while KI and KV individually represent the temperature coefficients of the current and voltage.…”
Section: Irradiance and Temperature Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.2 Simulations were conducted under the same conditions for the five MPPT algorithms and all of the experiments were performed with the same initial position of the operating points, as indicated in Section 2.5. The convergence judgment criteria, according to Equations (19) and (20), were the same for all the algorithms. Simulations were conducted under the same conditions for the five MPPT algorithms and all of the experiments were performed with the same initial position of the operating points, as indicated in Section 2.5.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the above, different researches have been carried out using traditional algorithms for the modeling and implementation of MPPT controllers [2], of which the following are highlighted: perturb and observe (P&O) [3,4], modified P&O [5,6], fractional short circuit current [7], fractional open circuit voltage [8], sliding mode control [9,10] and incremental conductance [11]. The P&O algorithm has been used traditionally, but it has been shown that this method has problems for tracking the MPP when there are sudden changes in solar irradiance [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%