2014 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing 2014
DOI: 10.1109/pdp.2014.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Performance Comparison of Container-Based Virtualization Systems for MapReduce Clusters

Abstract: Virtualization as a platform for resource-intensive applications, such as MapReduce (MR), has been the subject of many studies in the last years, as it has brought benefits such as better manageability, overall resource utilization, security and scalability. Nevertheless, because of the performance overheads, virtualization has traditionally been avoided in computing environments where performance is a critical factor. In this context, container-based virtualization can be considered a lightweight alternative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding coupled with the findings of Xavier et al [9,10] establish the premise that, for HPC scientific environments, the absence of performance interference cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding coupled with the findings of Xavier et al [9,10] establish the premise that, for HPC scientific environments, the absence of performance interference cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In this paper, the Montage GALFA application shrinks five (5) data cubes by averaging different number of planes (5,10,15,20,25) and then aggregates them into a mosaic [30] following three major steps.…”
Section: Interference-aware Scheduling For Dynamic Workloadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…we created a blkio cgroup [85] which controls the I/O policies enforced by the LXC process. The test included write operation of 5 GiB.…”
Section: Storage Footprint and Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the creation of VCs based on containers, studies like [191] analyzed and compared some of the container technologies available to the community (Linux-VServer, OpenVZ and LXC) from the point of view of MapReduce workloads, executing several benchmarks to test their performance and manageability. The results show that container-based systems reached near-native performance though LXC offers the best relationship of performance and isolation.…”
Section: Virtual Computer Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%