1992
DOI: 10.21236/ada252125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Performance-Based Comparison of Object-Oriented Simulation Tools

Abstract: This paper compares the performance and features of five different tools for object-oriented simulation. Three of the tools (MODSIM II, SES/workbench, and Sim++) are commercial products that are targeted exclusively at simulation work. Also examined are simulations in Smalltalk-80 and our own, non-commercial C++ simulation library, called MOOSE (MITRE Object-Oriented Simulation Executive). For each of the tools, we discuss the support for simulation, the support for object-oriented design and the degree to whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MOOSE adds several classes (primarily the process class) which facilitate the development of process model, discrete event, object-oriented, thread-based simulations. For a more complete description of MOOSE, see [3].…”
Section: Simulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOOSE adds several classes (primarily the process class) which facilitate the development of process model, discrete event, object-oriented, thread-based simulations. For a more complete description of MOOSE, see [3].…”
Section: Simulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%