2002
DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem0904_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Perceptual Measure of the Degree of Development of Proprietary Equipment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the internal consistency, the content validity and the construct validity have high values on the scales finally used (e.g. Flynn, et al, 1995;McKone et al, 1999;Sakakibara, et al, 1997;Cua et al, 2002;.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the internal consistency, the content validity and the construct validity have high values on the scales finally used (e.g. Flynn, et al, 1995;McKone et al, 1999;Sakakibara, et al, 1997;Cua et al, 2002;.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questionnaires have been reviewed over the HPM project's various rounds. Also, the items and scales used as the international HPM project's measurement instruments have been tested in line with prescriptive reliability and validity and internal consistency analyses (Flynn et al , 1995; McKone et al , 1999; Sakakibara et al , 1997; Ahmad and Schroeder, 2002; Cua et al , 2002; Marin-Garcia et al , 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original method of examining the MTMM matrix (Campbell and Fiske, 1959) has given way to examination of the covariance structure using confirmatory factor analysis Widaman, 1985), which enables the explicit partitioning of item variance into trait, method and error variance. While OM researchers have not used MTMM analysis (see Cua et al, 2002 andDetert et al, 2003, for exceptions) some strategy scholars have used it to assess performance measures (Venkatraman and Ramanujam, 1987). Fundamentally, MTMM analysis is called for to examine construct validity-without validity a discipline is not a science (Venkatraman and Grant, 1986).…”
Section: Multitrait-multimethods Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%