2023
DOI: 10.1017/jns.2023.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A peer support dietary change intervention for encouraging adoption and maintenance of the Mediterranean diet in a non-Mediterranean population (TEAM-MED): lessons learned and suggested improvements

Abstract: Peer support interventions for dietary change may offer cost-effective alternatives to interventions led by health professionals. This process evaluation of a trial to encourage the adoption and maintenance of a Mediterranean diet in a Northern European population at high CVD risk (TEAM-MED) aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing a group-based peer support intervention for dietary change, positive elements of the intervention and aspects that could be improved. Data on training and support for th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study in the UK evaluating the feasibility of a peer support intervention to encourage adoption of a MD reported challenges with recruitment and retention of participants (33,34). The successful recruitment and retention in the current study may be due to the use of individual-level recruitment, rather than the group-based approaches employed in the previous study, which may have ensured the inclusion of more engaged participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A previous study in the UK evaluating the feasibility of a peer support intervention to encourage adoption of a MD reported challenges with recruitment and retention of participants (33,34). The successful recruitment and retention in the current study may be due to the use of individual-level recruitment, rather than the group-based approaches employed in the previous study, which may have ensured the inclusion of more engaged participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%