2013
DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2013.833900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pedagogical framework for developing innovative science teachers with ICT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rogers and Twidle (2013) point out that the most significant products of teachers' professional development are the integration of ICT into the curriculum and the change in teacher's pedagogy towards teaching approaches that empower students to work more independently and reflectively. For ICT to become an integral component or tool for STEM learning, learners must develop an overarching conception of the subject matter with respect to technology and the meaning of studying with technology.…”
Section: Using Ict In Teaching and Learning Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers and Twidle (2013) point out that the most significant products of teachers' professional development are the integration of ICT into the curriculum and the change in teacher's pedagogy towards teaching approaches that empower students to work more independently and reflectively. For ICT to become an integral component or tool for STEM learning, learners must develop an overarching conception of the subject matter with respect to technology and the meaning of studying with technology.…”
Section: Using Ict In Teaching and Learning Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, higher education institutions have been facing the challenge of effectively preparing science teachers with professional competences on "how", "where", "when" and "whether" to use technology in science teaching contexts (Rogers & Twidle, 2013). In this context, Koehler & Mishra (2009) presented the model of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) which consists of the articulation of teachers' 'pedagogical content knowledge' (PCK), 'technological pedagogical knowledge' (TPK) and 'technological content knowledge' (TCK) (Koehler & Mishra, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, this means that teachers should possess a dynamic and transformative tacit knowledge of technology which is integrated into their pedagogical knowledge (PK) and content knowledge (CK) (Koehler, & Mishra, 2008;Chai, Koh, Tsai, & Tan, 2011;Rogers, & Twidle, 2013), as depicted in Figure 1. Figure 1.…”
Section: Promoting Meaningful Science Teaching and Learning Through Imentioning
confidence: 99%